On Israel's rejection, yesterday, of the inquiry urged by the report:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/world/middleeast/17gaza.html?scp=2&sq=Israel%20Goldstone%20rejected%20Gaza&st=cse

Richard Goldstone's op-ed in today NYTimes:
  
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/opinion/17goldstone.html?scp=1&sq=Richard%20Goldstone%20op-ed&st=cse.

MCM

Sinking the Goldstone Report
by Nadia Hijab

The UN's Goldstone Report is painstakingly 
even-handed. It finds evidence of war crimes and 
possible crimes against humanity not just against 
Israel but also against Palestinian armed groups. 
And that's the problem...

http://www.agenceglobal.com/Article.asp?Id=2133

Timing is everything.

On Monday, the United States assumed its seat on 
the United Nations Human Rights Council -- the 
one the Bush administration had cold-shouldered, 
then boycotted. The U.S. representative declared 
in Obamaesque tones, "Make no mistake: The United 
States will not look the other way in the face of 
serious human rights abuses."

And on Tuesday, Justice Richard Goldstone and his 
team submitted the report of their fact-finding 
mission into violations of international human 
rights and humanitarian law during Israel's 
December-January offensive against Gaza -- a 
report requested by the Council itself.

The Goldstone Report could derail the Obama 
administration's hopes of a two-state solution. 
Unless, that is, someone can sink it. An unlikely 
set of allies may come together to do so: Israel, 
given the findings against it of war crimes and 
possible crimes against humanity; the United 
States, to defend Israel as well as its own plans 
for the Middle East; Egypt; and the Palestinian 
Authority.

It would be quite hard to sink the Goldstone 
Report. One reason is the team's impeccable 
credentials. Goldstone, a South African Jew with 
close ties to Israel, served as Prosecutor of the 
International Criminal Tribunals for the former 
Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Another member, Hina 
Jilani, participated in the commission of inquiry 
on Darfur. Israel and its supporters always 
complain that no one looks at other countries' 
abuses. Well, this team has.

Moreover, the Goldstone Report is painstakingly 
even-handed. It finds evidence of war crimes and 
possibly crimes against humanity not just against 
Israel but also against Palestinian armed groups. 
And it criticizes both Hamas and the Palestinian 
Authority for human rights violations in their 
crackdowns on each other's members.

In addition, the Goldstone team provides almost 
no room for anyone to wriggle out of its 
recommendations. It requests the Human Rights 
Council to submit its report to the Security 
Council, where the United States has a veto, as 
well as to the U.N. General Assembly, where it 
does not.

It calls on Israel as well as the authorities in 
Gaza to launch independent and credible 
investigations into the violations. And to make 
sure they do, it asks that an independent team of 
experts be established to review progress. If the 
process is not credible -- as measured against 
international law standards -- then the Gaza 
situation should be referred to the International 
Criminal Court at the end of six months. It also 
upholds universal jurisdiction, calling on other 
states to undertake criminal investigations in 
their national courts so as to prevent impunity.

The Report politely expresses doubt that Israel 
will make reparations to the Palestinians of Gaza 
for the extensive damage inflicted on them and 
their infrastructure -- so it recommends that the 
General Assembly establish an escrow account into 
which Israel would pay.

The Obama administration could send a strong 
signal by voting to submit the report to the 
General Assembly, or even by abstaining. But, 
despite its fine words on Monday, it is more 
likely to want to bury it. Otherwise, attention 
will focus on prosecuting an Israel it's trying 
to nudge to the negotiating table. The problem it 
will face is that Third World countries dominate 
both the Human Rights Council and General 
Assembly and they traditionally support 
Palestinian rights. So it will seek an alliance 
with Egypt and the Palestinian Authority. If they 
indicate they do not want the report to go 
forward, the rest of the Third World would find 
it hard to go over their heads.

But could Egypt and the Palestinian Authority 
possibly want to stop accountability for war 
crimes in Gaza? Hard to believe, but they may 
have already done so earlier this year when 
Father Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, the General 
Assembly's Nicaraguan president, tried to get the 
international community to stop the slaughter.

Father Miguel has named no names, but in his 
speech at the end of his one-year term this week, 
he left little doubt about what happened. He said 
he had tried to persuade "those who should have 
been most closely involved" to convene the 
General Assembly to help the Palestinians under 
fire. But "all I received was advice to give the 
process more timeŠ we should do nothing that 
could endanger the success that was always just 
beyond our reach."

And he went on to make a very serious accusation 
against "those who should supposedly have been 
most interested" yet "denied their support." He 
said he hoped "that they were right and that I 
was wrong. Otherwise, we face an ugly situation 
of constant complicity with the aggression 
against the rights of the noble and 
long-suffering Palestinian people."

If this complicity repeats itself at the Human 
Rights Council, the Goldstone Report will be 
sunk. The power of the state system (and a 
putative statelet) will have trumped the 
principles of international law and human rights 
-- unless human rights advocates act to make sure 
the right thing gets done.


Nadia Hijab is an independent analyst and a 
senior fellow at the Institute for Palestine 
Studies.

Copyright © 2009 Nadia Hijab - distributed by Agence Global




=========================


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, 
this material is distributed without profit to 
those who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information for research 
and educational purposes. 

You are receiving this message because you are 
signed up to be on Baltimore News Network's News 
List. To be removed, please send a reply message 
with REMOVE in the subject line.

For information about Baltimore News Network, 
Inc., a 501(c)(3) organization, or to make a 
donation to BNN via PayPal, visit 
<http://baltimorechronicle.com>http://baltimorechronicle.com.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to