*A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in
healthcare workers *

*C Raina MacIntyre,1 Holly Seale,1 Tham Chi Dung,2 Nguyen Tran Hien,2 Phan
Thi Nga,2 Abrar Ahmad Chughtai,1 Bayzidur Rahman,1 Dominic E Dwyer,3 Quanyi
Wang4 To cite: MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al. *

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/5/4/e006577.full.pdf

*A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in
healthcare workers. BMJ Open 2015;5: e006577. doi:10.1136/
bmjopen-2014-006577 ▸ *
*Prepublication history for this paper is available online. To view these
files please visit the journal online (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/
bmjopen-2014-006577 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/%0Dbmjopen-2014-006577>). *
*Received 9 September 2014 Revised 25 March 2015 Accepted 26 March 2015 For
numbered affiliations see end of article. Correspondence to Professor C
Raina *
*MacIntyre; [email protected] <[email protected]> *

*ABSTRACT *

*Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth
masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null
hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth
masks. Setting: 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi,
Vietnam. *

*Participants: 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in
selected high-risk wards. Intervention: Hospital wards were randomised to:
medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which
included mask wearing). Participants used the mask on every shift for 4
consecutive weeks. Main outcome measure: Clinical respiratory illness
(CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratoryconfirmed respiratory
virus infection. *

*Results: The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth
mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the
cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared
with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates
of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI
(RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratoryconfirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95%
CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group
compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by
particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. *

*Conclusions: This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results
caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to
inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth
masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.
Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks
globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be
recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines
need to be updated. Trial registration number: Australian New Z*

-- 
If you appreciate News From Underground, please consider making a donation — 
either a one-time gift or a monthly subscription: 
http://markcrispinmiller.com/support/
Thank you for your support.

Ways to unsubscribe:
1) send a blank email to [email protected]
PLEASE NOTE: you must unsubscribe using the SAME email with which you subscribed

2) go to http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page.

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "News 
From Underground" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/newsfromunderground/CAGxB6W-yhSMoMA_KjMO46LP0Omm%3DYA9%2Bym1yKKkqX2mfaxWN1g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to