Chargesheet on Malegav Blasts

With Regards 

Abi
 
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Khalid Bilal <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Khalid Bilal <[email protected]>
Subject:  A Hindutva plot - Chargesheet on Malegav Blasts
To: 
Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 11:04 PM







TERRORISM

A Hindutva plot 
ANUPAMA KATAKAM 
  



The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad's charge-sheet against the Malegaon blast 
accused proves that a network of Hindu militant groups exists. 



VIVEK BENDRE 
 
K.P. Raghuvanshi, chief of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad that filed a 
charge-sheet against the Malegaon blast accused. 

THEIR plans may not be as sophisticated as those of jehadi terrorists and their 
arms training not as good as that of the fidayeen, but the 11 persons arrested 
in connection with a bomb explosion in Malegaon in September 2008, the police 
say, are equally dangerous. 
Maharashtra' s Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) recently filed its charge-sheet 
against this group in the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) 
court. The revelations that the investigation resulted in were startling. 
When the group was arrested in October-November 2008, the theories that Hindu 
right-wing terror cells existed became a reality. The charge-sheet now says 
that these groups not only exist but are actively working on an agenda severely 
detrimental to communal harmony.
The charge-sheet explains that there was a larger conspiracy hatched by the 
blast accused. Malegaon was their first act of terror. Six people died and 101 
were injured in a bomb explosion at Bhiku Chowk, a crowded area in Malegaon, a 
small textile town in Maharashtra with a large number of Muslims.
The charge-sheet says the 11 accused were linked to the Hindu fundamentalist 
group called Abhinav Bharat. [This is different from the organisation by the 
same name, which is registered as a public charitable trust.] It was to be a 
front organisation "with the intention of propagating a Hindu Rashtra with 
their own constitution and aims and objectives as Bharat Swaraya, Surajya 
Suraksha." The Abhinav Bharat had put together an ambitious plan that called 
for a Taliban-like government, which would ensure that India was rid of anyone 
opposed to the idea of a Hindu Rashtra, it says.
In order to accomplish its goals it would start by fighting terror with terror. 
It would raise funds through businesses such as retail stores and impart arms 
and ammunition training to those who were interested in the plan. The 
organisation had also planned to approach Israel for help. It had even decided 
to adopt a national flag, which was to be saffron in colour with a gold border.
SANTOSH HIRLEKAR/PTI 
 
Some of the accused in the Malegaon blast case: (from left) Lt.Col. S.K. 
Purohit, Rakesh Dhawade, Major RameshUpadhyay (retd), Sadhvi Pragya Singh 
Thakur and Sudhakar Dwivedi alias Dayanand Pandey. 

This and much more is revealed in the 4,528-page charge-sheet, filed by the 
ATS. Along with extensive details on the planning and execution of the bomb 
blast, the charge-sheet gives background information on each of the arrested 
and the wanted. 
The 11 extremists arrested are Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt. Col. Prasad 
Shikant Purohit, Sudhakar Dwivedi alias Dayanand Pandey, Rakesh Dhawade, Sameer 
Kulkarni, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Shivnarayan Kalsangra, Shyam Sahu, Major Ramesh 
Upadhyay (retd), Ajay Rahirkar and Jagdish Mhatra. Among the people accused but 
absconding are Ramji, Sandeep Vishwas Dange and Pravin Mutalik. Ramji's 
capture, say the police, would help unravel much more.
K.P. Raghuvanshi, ATS chief, categorically stated that Purohit, who was a 
serving Army officer, Thakur, Rahirkar and Dwivedi, a self-styled god man, were 
the masterminds behind the blast. They chose Malegaon for its high 
concentration of Muslims. Furthermore, they hoped to mislead investigating 
agencies as the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) was responsible for 
an attack on the town in 2006, said Raghuvanshi.Terror trail 

The charge-sheet says that all the accused "entered into a criminal conspiracy 
between January 2008 and October 23, 2008, with the intention to strike terror 
in the minds of people by exploding a bomb in Malegaon…". 
It says that members of Abhinav Bharat held meetings at various places such as 
Ahmedabad, Ujjain, Faridabad, Kolkata, Bhopal, Jabalpur, Indore, Pune and 
Nashik. Purohit met the other accused during the various meetings in these 
cities. At every place, he would assign them a task related to an attack. For 
instance, in Ujjain, he asked Dhawade to provide explosives to Ramji and Dange 
in Pune, the charge-sheet says. 
Purohit procured the RDX (Research Department Explosive) used in the blast 
during his military posting in Jammu and Kashmir. He stored it in his houses in 
Pune and Nashik. The task of making the bomb was given to Chaturvedi in Nashik. 
Many people were attracted to Abhinav Bharat's ideology and its commitment to 
establish a Hindu Rashtra, explains Raghuvanshi. 
Interrogations revealed that Purohit collected nearly Rs.21 lakh for the 
organisation. The amount was kept with Rahirkar, who disbursed it to Dwivedi 
and others to procure hand grenades and other ammunition. The police, who 
interrogated this band of Hindu right-wing terrorists, say that it was tough to 
get details from the accused. "Most would deny any involvement. Then we showed 
them corroborating evidence and that broke them," said a police officer. For 
instance, we have been able to get recorded phone conversations between 
Purohit, Rahirkar and Upadhyay, with them discussing the activities of Abhinav 
Bharat. 
Then there is the seizure of Dwivedi's laptop. All the literature, plans and 
agenda of Abhinav Bharat were found in it. The police even found pictures there 
of Muslims killing Hindus. "When we confronted them with this, they had no 
choice but to tell us their tale," said the officer. 
An interesting aspect of the Malegaon case is the involvement of Himani 
Savarkar, niece of Nathuram Godse (Mahatma Gandhi's assassin) and daughter-in- 
law of Narayan Savarkar, the brother of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. Himani 
Savarkar, a member of Abhinav Bharat, was present at the meeting in which the 
Malegaon conspiracy was hatched. Raghuvanshi was unwilling to comment on her 
involvement.
VIVEK BENDRE 
 
A gathering of volunteers of the Hindu Rashtra Sena in support of S.K. Purohit, 
outside a Nashik court on November 15, 2008. 

The accused have been booked under the Indian Penal Code for murder (Section 
302), attempt to murder (Section 307), and conspiracy (Section 120-B); for 
promoting enmity between groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, 
residence, language and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony 
(Section 153A); sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Indian Arms Act; and sections 3, 4, 
5, 6 of the Explosive Substances Act. 
The MCOCA was slapped on them on the basis of two charge-sheets against Dhawade 
for his involvement in the Nanded and Parbhani blasts. The MCOCA is a tough 
law, which allows the police to hold the accused in custody for a long period 
of time. This gives the prosecution a lot of leeway. 
It allows confessions given to any senior police officer to be used as 
admissible evidence in court. The defence lawyers say that the MCOCA was 
slapped just for this and that the case does not require such a stringent law. 
The arguments, which have begun, now focus more on the use of the MCOCA than on 
the actual crime. 
Hemant Karkare, ATS chief, had cracked the Malegaon case just before he was 
killed in the Mumbai terror attacks. The key to the case was the tracing of the 
ownership of a motorcycle used in the blast to Pragya Singh Thakur. 
Her arrest and subsequent investigations led the ATS to Purohit and the rest. 
Purohit's arrest sent shock waves across the country, as a serving Army officer 
was linked to terrorists. Ever since a pipe bomb exploded in Nanded in 2006, 
there has been some noise about Hindu extremists being responsible for sporadic 
bomb blasts in Maharashtra. 
The emergence of Abhinav Bharat shows that there is indeed a Hindu militant 
movement. Should it be painted with the same brush as the jehadi groups are? 
Concerned groups believe it should be crushed now before it turns into a 
monster. 

Source: http://www.frontlin eonnet.com/ stories/20090213 260313200. htm
 
. 

__,_._,___














      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"newsline" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsline?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to