>From the mySociety blog.

Does anyone know if any U.S. states are obliged to reply to a FOI request
that comes in via email by email?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Steven Clift" <[email protected]>
Date: Jun 8, 2015 9:04 PM
Subject: mySociety: Learnings from AlaveteliCon (2): the challenges are the
same
To: <[email protected]>
Cc:

The Freedom of Information technologies conference, AlaveteliCon
> <http://ift.tt/1FS7Ekt>, provided an excellent chance to share
> experiences and advice.
>
> We heard from people who run Alaveteli <http://alaveteli.org> sites all
> over the world, and we learned that many of the challenges in running FOI
> sites are similar, no matter where they are. That’s great, because it means
> that we can combine our knowledge and share our experience to overcome them.
>
> Alaveteli is designed to work anywhere. The ideal is of a website which
> shows users how to make an FOI request, and sends it off to the right
> recipient to get it answered, then publishes the reply, ensuring that the
> information becomes truly open. But in many places, local circumstances
> interrupt that process at various stages.
>
> Here are some of the sticking points that were brought up. We may not have
> immediate solutions for all of them, but there were plenty of ideas mooted
> at the conference.
>
> If you’d like to add some more, *please do comment on the Alaveteli
> mailing list <http://ift.tt/1GlsN8p>*. It would be great to see further
> discussion and ideas.
> Bureaucracy
>
> Alaveteli, in its basic form, doesn’t cater for certain FOI processes. We
> heard of cases where:
>
>    - A small fee is payable for each FOI request;
>    - Making a request requires an electronic ID <http://ift.tt/1Ipytxq>
>    or digital signature <http://ift.tt/xBhCKf>, which most people don’t
>    have and which is not trivial to apply for;
>    - Responses are only provided by post, on paper, thus circumventing
>    publication online;
>    - Requests are not accepted by email (although this ruling has also
>    been turned around successfully in at least one country—Uruguay
>    <http://ift.tt/1IpyvW6>—and indeed it is an issue that WhatDoTheyKnow
>    faced in the UK <http://ift.tt/1GlsNoF>);
>    - Authorities will not reply to the email addresses that FOI sites
>    generate, because they are not “real” (ie they are not attached to the
>    requester’s own personal email account);
>    - The requester must give their name, phone number and address. This
>    is already a potential disincentive to making a request, but then the
>    response often includes them and they must be manually redacted by the site
>    administrator.
>
> Here are a few of the solutions which were mentioned:
>
>    - Where digital signatures are required, site admins are sending off
>    requests on behalf of users: it’s not ideal and it takes a lot of time, but
>    it is doable.
>    - Similarly, the (non-Alaveteli) Russian FOI site RosOtvet
>    <http://rosotvet.ru/> passes users’ requests by a panel of lawyers,
>    who make sure they are correctly worded in order that they stand the best
>    chance of being considered.
>    - Frag Den Staat <http://ift.tt/vfrTes>, which is a German
>    non-Alaveteli FOI site, includes a function where users can scan and upload
>    their responses, where they’ve been provided on paper. It also allows users
>    to redact any parts they’d like to keep private.
>    - Additionally, in response to authorities complaining that their
>    email addresses weren’t ‘real’, Frag Den Staat set up their own email
>    provider called Echtemail (which translates as ‘real email’) and started
>    sending requests from there instead. It hasn’t changed things yet, but they
>    are continuing to campaign.
>    - In Australia, this same “not a real email address” policy was
>    challenged—and overcome—by a volunteer at RightToKnow.org.au
>    <http://ift.tt/1GlsNoH>, who got a new ruling put in place
>    <http://ift.tt/1Ipytxy>.
>    - In places where any type of email has been refused as a legitimate
>    channel for an FOI request, that should be challenged. There are examples
>    elsewhere (for example, in the UK) of requests being accepted via Twitter!
>    Uruguay and Australia have shown that rulings can be overturned; let’s
>    share experiences and see if we can do the same in other places.
>    - Keep highlighting the barriers and absurdities as you come across
>    them, on your blog, in press releases, in whatever interviews you can get.
>    There may be a general, unquestioned belief that your country has a
>    functional FOI law: if your experience says otherwise, that narrative
>    should be challenged. If you can position yourself as an expert on the
>    niceties of FOI, the press will keep returning to you—and the better known
>    you become, the more weight your campaigning will carry.
>    - …Other ideas? Let the  Alaveteli mailing list <http://ift.tt/1GlsN8p>
>    know.
>
> And some solutions we don’t recommend:
>
> While it might be possible to add, say, a payment facility through a
> bolt-on service like PayPal, it tends to be our policy not to recommend
> this kind of adaptation.
>
> Why? Because our general advice is to run the site *as if we lived in an
> ideal world*—in other words, run your Alaveteli site as though Freedom of
> Information were truly open to all, at no cost and with no barriers.
>
> It’s the same philosophy that leads us to advocate for an ‘applicant
> blind’ FOI system, where it doesn’t matter who’s making a request because
> everyone has an equal right to information under the law.
>
> In a more extreme example, it’s also why we advise people to set up
> Alaveteli sites even if there is no legal right to information in their
> country.
> Non-compliance
>
> In some places, there’s no law in place obliging authorities to respond to
> requests. In others, the law exists, but it’s not very well adhered to. The
> result is the same: requests get sent, but for some, no reply ever arrives.
>
> Clearly this is a fundamental problem in itself, but it also has a
> knock-on effect for the site as a whole: people lose faith in the system if
> they can see that it’s not getting results.
>
> This is a harder nut to crack, but here are some thoughts:
>
> In countries such as the UK, Croatia, and Czech Republic, there is a
> system in place to pre-empt non-compliance. In our view, this is the sign
> of an FOI law that is treated seriously by the authorities.
>
> In these countries, the right to Freedom of Information is backed up by an
> independent ombudsman. Additionally, anyone who doesn’t get a response
> within the statutory amount of time is entitled to seek an internal review:
> that process is automatically embedded in Alaveteli, with a reminder going
> out to the user if they haven’t received a reply in time.
>
> If you do not have such a system in your own country, the advice was to
> campaign and highlight poor practices: again, this is an area where
> successful campaigners should be able to share knowledge with those who
> need it.
>
> Data about the percentage of requests that are going unanswered can make a
> compelling story for the press, and also help with campaigning and
> advocacy. Highlight success stories, and show the public value of FOI.
>
> For a great example of this, see this report from TuDerechoASaber in Spain
> <http://ift.tt/1er6WuX>. Need a quick way to get at your site’s
> statistics? Foie-Graphs <http://ift.tt/1IpytxA> will do just that for any
> Alaveteli instance.
>
> If you have additional ideas, let everyone know on the Alaveteli mailing
> list <http://ift.tt/1GlsN8p>.
> Slippery authorities
>
> Henare from Open Australia <http://ift.tt/176875k> told the story of Detention
> Logs <http://ift.tt/1IpytxE>, a campaign to bring transparency and
> accountability to the detention of immigrants by publishing data on
> conditions and events inside detention centres.
>
> While the authorities did not simply refuse to respond to requests for
> information, they found a way to evade their duties, deciding that 85
> varied requests (pertaining to different events and detention centres all
> across the country) could be counted as one. Then, having rolled them into
> a single request, they were able to declare that it fell under the banner
> of ‘an unreasonable amount of effort’ required to respond.
>
> Henare stated that one of Alaveteli’s great strengths is the fact that it
> publishes out requests even if they go unanswered. That means that they
> stand testament to the facts that authorities don’t want to release, as
> well as those that they do. Detention Logs will persist as an archive for
> the future, and maybe the situation will be turned around in more
> enlightened times.
> Official government sites
>
> We heard that in Uruguay, the government are planning to start their own
> online FOI website. As it happens, mySociety has also been involved with
> setting up an FOI site for the government in Panama. So it’s interesting to
> ask whether there is a place for independent Alaveteli sites to exist in
> tandem with the official sites.
>
> One thing to note is that Alaveteli was built with the user, the citizen,
> always in mind. Sites built on Alaveteli make it easy and safe to file an
> FOI request, while government sites are more likely to have government
> needs in mind.
>
> For example, we don’t yet know whether the Uruguayan government site also
> intends to publish requests and responses. If not, the ‘added value’ of
> Uruguay’s Alaveteli site would be obvious.
> But! Together we’re stronger
>
> Any one of these sticking points can seem like a real problem. But as well
> as a software platform, Alaveteli is a community, and we can work together
> to get results.
>
> If you need help or advice, you can always ask on the Alaveteli mailing
> list <http://ift.tt/1GlsN8p>, where you will find people just waiting to
> share their support. There are now 20 Alaveteli installs, each representing
> a learning curve and a wealth of experience for their implementers.
> Together, we have more global knowledge on FOI than perhaps any other
> organisation—let’s use it!
>
>
>
>
>
> —
>
> Image: Particlem <http://ift.tt/1GlsL06> (CC <http://ift.tt/N3rZKX>)
>
>
> from mySociety http://ift.tt/1IpyvWc
> via IFTTT <http://ift.tt/1bODNcb>

――
View topic http://groups.dowire.org/r/topic/2er0JuT1bIQKR3KT1vuHkp
Leave group mailto:[email protected]?Subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to