For those first interested in the "democracy" side of digital democracy.

I do wonder what more could be done to digitally organize support for civil
society organizations under fundamental attack in so many countries. Any
ideas? - Steve
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation" <
[email protected]>
Date: Jul 8, 2015 3:33 AM
Subject: CIVICUS statement on release of State of Civil Society Report 2015
To: "CIVICUS Friend" <[email protected]>
Cc:

           State of Civil Society Report 2015    View this in your browser
<http://us6.campaign-archive1.com/?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=4fba1fb91d&e=b2316566d3>

>From Ebola to the bombing of Gaza, civil society was the first responder to
humanitarian emergencies during the last year, but faces dire threats and a
funding crisis around the world, says a new report.

“During the last year civil society was everywhere, doing great work often
at the frontline of the world’s challenges, but at the same time having to
stave off threats to its very existence,” said Dr Dhananjayan
Sriskandarajah, the CIVICUS Secretary-General on launching the
organisation’s 2015 State of Civil Society Report.

CIVICUS, a global alliance of civil society organisations, says that in
addition to the work it does on pressing global challenges, such as
poverty, inequality and climate change, civil society also finds itself at
the frontlines of response when it comes to humanitarian emergencies,
including those caused by conflicts and disasters.

In addition to the Ebola crisis and natural disasters in Nepal and Vanuatu,
civil society has, in the last year, also been called on to respond to a
range of conflicts, including in Syria, Yemen, Ukraine, Gaza, Central
African Republic and South Sudan.

“Despite the incredible work that civil society does, it remains under
attack. In 2014 alone, we documented serious violations of `civic space’ –
the freedoms of expression, association and assembly – in a staggering 96
countries around the world. Taking the size of these countries into
account, it means that 6 out of 7 humans lived in countries where their
civic freedoms were under threat.”

“To make matters worse, organisations that need funds the most, largely
based in the Global South, receive only a fraction of the billions of
dollars of funding that goes to the sector. It’s an untenable situation.
Many funders know that civil society is doing essential work but we need
more bravery from them to ensure the survival of those on the frontline,”
stated Sriskandarajah.

Interestingly, there is a link between civic space and resourcing trends.
“It is not surprising that domestic civil society does not have the
capacity to defend itself against attacks on civic space if donors have
systematically underinvested in local organisations,” Sriskandarajah said.

The report provides a comprehensive `year in review’ of civil society and
the conditions it works in around the world, drawing on a range of inputs
from experts and activists on the ground. In addition to reviewing the
civil society landscape as a whole, this year’s theme focuses on the
resourcing of what is called `change-seeking’ Civil Society Organisations
(CSOs) i.e. those that seek policy change, hold elites accountable and seek
to uphold human rights.

The report calls on governments to honour their commitments to protecting
citizens’ fundamental rights, for donors to be braver and for civil society
to stand together and show solidarity in the face of the threats it
increasingly faces.

*A few highlights from the Year in Review:*

   - 2014/2015 demonstrated that civil society is the first responder to
   humanitarian emergencies, including those caused by conflicts and disasters.
   - We continue to see a rejection of conventional politics, because
   increasing numbers of citizens see through the attempts to mask collusion
   between political and economic elites.
   - The trajectory of contemporary protest movements generally takes an
   identified pattern of growing from small local issues to larger more
   profound matters such as inequality and lack of voice.
   - The power of civil society is recognised indirectly, when elites try
   to suppress civil society’s essential role of speaking truth to power.
   - In 2014, there were significant attacks on the fundamental civil
   society rights of free association, free assembly and free expression in 96
   countries.
   - Threats to civil society emanate from both state and non-state actors
   that benefit from perpetuating governance failures and denying human
   rights; including corrupt politicians, unaccountable officials,
   unscrupulous businesses and religious fundamentalists.
   - New attempts are underway, even by democratic states, to roll back
   long-established human rights norms, which are described as obstacles to
   national development and security, while critical voices are conflated with
   terrorism.
   - Hostility to civil society is becoming normalised, and CSO energy is
   being forced into fighting existential threats.

*Key insights on resourcing for civil society:*

   - Change-seeking CSOs are finding it harder to receive funding,
   including funding from international sources because of government
   restrictions.
   - Many governments want to subdue CSOs that express dissent, and where
   there is an absence of domestic resourcing bases for change-seeking CSOs,
   restriction of cross-border funding is an effective tactic.
   - Out of the $166 billion spent on official development assistance (ODA
   or aid) by OECD-DAC countries in 2013, only 13%, or $21 billion, went to
   civil society.
   - Although current data is hard to obtain, the latest estimate from 2011
   suggests that Southern-based NGOs get only around 1% of all aid directly.
   - Many traditional donors are trimming their list of priority countries,
   and withdrawing particularly from countries assessed as having middle
   income status, despite their engrained social problems. E.g. Brazil and
   South Africa.
   - The rise of new economic powers, such as the BRICS countries, means
   that some Global South states are now donors, but almost all their support
   is for government-led initiatives.
   - We are seeing new donor conservatism with aid being more strongly
   connected with strategic foreign policy and trade agendas of donor
   governments, and the stronger pushing of free market policies on recipient
   countries to create opportunities for donor country businesses
   - Many international CSOs risk being seen as promoters of their home
   governments’ foreign policy agendas, and channels for government attempts
   to use ODA to project soft power.
   - At the domestic level, state funding often goes only to CSOs on
   favourable terms with ruling elites, and strongly favours service-oriented
   work.
   - A lot of funding for CSOs is short term and project focused often not
   lasting long enough to usher in systemic change
   - To counter negative trends, CSOs need to exercise exemplary
   transparency, demonstrate accountability to citizens, develop volunteerism
   and entrepreneurial capacity, where relevant, to reduce donor reliance.
   - CSOs should establish and implement resourcing policies to clarify the
   grounds on which they accept and do not accept resources from donors.
   - Conventional approaches to philanthropy are not working; donors need
   to be braver in their resourcing decisions to support the change the world
   needs.

To download the full report or individual sections, please visit:
http://civicus.org/index.php/en/media-centre-129/reports-and-publications/socs2015
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=1e3b1aba20&e=b2316566d3>
.


<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=92da79189d&e=b2316566d3>
Facebook
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=f919b032ca&e=b2316566d3>
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=e2a2a7eb38&e=b2316566d3>
Twitter
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=5fda1ff171&e=b2316566d3>
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=d235b9f85c&e=b2316566d3>
CIVICUS.org
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=bcaa99e386&e=b2316566d3>
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=3ad17ff2e9&e=b2316566d3>
YouTube
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=63dff58435&e=b2316566d3>
*Copyright © 2015 CIVICUS World Alliance for Citizen Participation, All
rights reserved.*
You are receiving this email, because (a) you are a citizen/organisational
member of CIVICUS (b) you requested that we add you to our mailimg list via
email, telephone or (c) you filled out a subscription form on our website

*Our mailing address is:*
CIVICUS World Alliance for Citizen Participation
24 Gwigwi Mwrebi Street
Newtown
Johannesburg, Gauteng 2001
South Africa

Add us to your address book
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/vcard?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=1b19f1efbc>


unsubscribe from this list
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=1b19f1efbc&e=b2316566d3&c=4fba1fb91d>
update subscription preferences
<http://civicus.us6.list-manage.com/profile?u=9283ff78aa53cccd2800739dc&id=1b19f1efbc&e=b2316566d3>

――
View topic http://groups.dowire.org/r/topic/7IFGGnl1fwhq4uAn2O2IbF
Leave group mailto:[email protected]?Subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to