<https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jul/05/tiktok-girls-dead-blackout-challenge>

Parents of two girls who died in a 2021 “blackout challenge” on TikTok, which 
encouraged users to choke themselves until they passed out, filed a suit on 
Tuesday in the Los Angeles county superior court.

Represented by the Social Media Victims Law Center (SMVLC), a legal resource 
for parents of children harmed by social media addiction and abuse, they allege 
the platform’s “dangerous algorithm intentionally and repeatedly” pushed videos 
of the challenge into the children’s feeds, incentivizing them to participate 
in the challenge that ultimately took their lives.

“TikTok needs to be held accountable for pushing deadly content to these two 
young girls,” said Matthew P Bergman, founding attorney of SMVLC. “TikTok has 
invested billions of dollars to intentionally design products that push 
dangerous content that it knows is dangerous and can result in the deaths of 
its users.”

One victim, eight-year-old Lalani Erika Renee Walton of Temple, Texas, is 
described as “an extremely sweet and outgoing young girl” who “loved dressing 
up as a princess and playing with makeup”. She died on 15 July 2021 in what 
police determined was “a direct result of attempting TikTok’s ‘Blackout 
Challenge’”, according to the complaint.

Lalani had received a phone for her eighth birthday in April 2021 and “quickly 
became addicted to watching TikTok videos”, the complaint said. She often 
posted videos of herself singing and dancing, in hopes of becoming “TikTok 
famous”.

In July 2021, her family began noticing bruising on Lalani’s neck, which she 
explained away as an accident. Unbeknown to them, she had begun participating 
in the blackout challenge, which had first showed up on her feed weeks before.

On the day of her death, Lalani had spent hours on a family road trip watching 
videos, including posts of the challenge.

“She was also under the belief that if she posted a video of herself doing the 
Blackout Challenge, then she would become famous and so she decided to give it 
a try,” the complaint said. “Lalani was eight years old at the time and did not 
appreciate or understand the dangerous nature of what TikTok was encouraging 
her to do.”

The other victim named in the suit, nine-year-old Arriani Jaileen Arroyo of 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, received a phone when she was seven years old and used 
TikTok multiple times a day, according to the complaint. She “gradually became 
obsessive” about posting dance videos on TikTok and became “addicted” to the 
app.

In January 2021, Arriani’s family discussed with her an incident of a young 
TikTok user dying as the result of a challenge, but the Arriani assured them 
she would never participate in dangerous videos.
Close up of face of Arriani Jaileen Arroyo
Arriani Jaileen Arroyo. Photograph: Courtesy of the family

However, on 26 February 2021 she was found not breathing by her five-year-old 
brother. She was rushed to a local hospital but ultimately taken off life 
support.

“TikTok unquestionably knew that the deadly Blackout Challenge was spreading 
through their app and that their algorithm was specifically feeding the 
Blackout Challenge to children, including those who have died,” the complaint 
reads.

The lawsuit lists a number of complaints against TikTok, including that its 
algorithm promotes harmful content, allows underage users on the app, and it 
fails to warn users or their legal guardians of the app’s addictive nature.

TikTok did not immediately respond to request for comment.

The company has been criticized in the past for allowing dangerous challenges 
to spread. Doctors reported that the 2021 “milk crate challenge”, which 
encouraged users to stack and climb milk crates, led to dislocated shoulders, 
ACL tears and even spinal cord injuries. In 2020, a 15-year-old girl died after 
participating in the “Benadryl challenge”, in which users took a large amount 
of anti-histamines in an attempt to produce hallucinogenic effects. In 2020, 
two minors were charged with assault after participating in the “skull breaker” 
challenge, which caused one victim to have a seizure.

Attorneys for the SMVLC claimed the company knowingly allowed such content to 
proliferate on the platform because it increased engagement, user numbers and 
ultimately profit.

“TikTok prioritized greater corporate profits over the health and safety of its 
users and, specifically, over the health and safety of vulnerable children 
TikTok knew or should have known were actively using its social media product,” 
they said.

The Walton and Arroyo families are seeking an unspecified amount in damages and 
have requested a jury trial to take place in California.
_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
[email protected]
https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Reply via email to