'pappagallo stocastico' è un ossimoro: i pappagalli sono notoriamente deterministici, ma forse l'efficacia dell'epiteto è proprio in questa giustapposizione nessuno sa cosa davvero accade in quelle cucine. a me piace pensare che stiano lavorando per evitare sequenze 'verbatim' e dover pagare pegno al NYT e a tutti gli altri G.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 20:37, Daniela Tafani <daniela.taf...@unipi.it> wrote: > On February 20, 2024, an optimization to the user experience introduced a > bug with how the model processes language. > > LLMs generate responses by randomly sampling words based in part on > probabilities. Their “language” consists of numbers that map to tokens. > > In this case, the bug was in the step where the model chooses these > numbers. Akin to being lost in translation, the model chose slightly wrong > numbers, which produced word sequences that made no sense. More > technically, inference kernels produced incorrect results when used in > certain GPU configurations. > > Upon identifying the cause of this incident, we rolled out a fix and > confirmed that the incident was resolved. > Posted 18 hours ago. Feb 21, 2024 - 17:03 PST > > > https://openai.statuspage.io/incidents/ssg8fh7sfyz3 > > Come hanno osservato in molti, la definizione di chatGPT fornita dai > tecnici di OpenAI è quella a cui ci si riferisce con "pappagallo > stocastico". > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa@server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
