On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 14:01:14 PM +0200, alessandro marzocchi wrote: > Ciao Marco, sono in pensione da tempo cercando di dimenticare il più possibile > delle mie esperienze giuridiche. > Risponderei come hai ipotizzato, senza indicare l'importo che intenderesti > pagare. > Scriverei disconoscendo danni e tua responsabilità, aggiungendo che sei > disposto ad un pagamento esclusivamente per evitare azioni e/o richieste > ulteriori e chiedendo loro di indicare l'importo. > Cordialmente, > Duccio (Alessandro Marzocchi)
Buonasera Duccio, e lista, grazie per il consiglio, solo una domanda: se ho capito bene, ritieni quindi che, oltre a disconoscere danni all'autore della foto e responsabilita', non sia opportuno/necessario dire subito esplicitamente che anche nell'eventualita' remotissima che profitto ci fosse stato, sarebbe praticamente nullo, dell'ordine delle **frazioni** di Euro? Grazie ancora, anche in anticipo a tutti coloro che vorranno intervenire. Marco > Il giorno mar 22 apr 2025 alle ore 21:12 <[email protected]> > ha scritto: > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:10:10 +0000 > From: "Marco Fioretti" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [nexa] urgente: pareri e consigli su richiesta copytrack > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Salve a tutti, > > ho appena ricevuto la richiesta parzialmente copiata qui sotto, di pagare > 350 euro per una immagine che avrei inserito illegalmente in un post del > mio blog 5 anni fa. > > Dico "avrei" perche' ovviamente non ricordo assolutamente i dettagli della > cosa, ma 99,999... volte su 100 le immagini su quel blog sono screenshot a > bassa risoluzione di PARTI di immagini. L'unica cosa di cui sono > assolutamente sicuro e' che comunque stiano le cose aver usato > quell'immagine non mi ha fruttato piu' di 1 Euro in totale, a essere > proprio generosi. > > Inoltre, vedo online diversi "avvisi" che la compagnia in questione adotta > pratiche quantomeno discutibili: > > https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2024/10/11/ > > from-interview-series-to-legal-battle-yay-images-and-copytrack-come-after-the-brutally-honest-blog > / > > https://kanzlei-franz.com/copytrack-scam-or-legitimate/ > > ma non mi e' chiaro quanto quelle considerazioni valgano per sito gestito > dall'Italia su hosting tedesco. > > A parte questo, che fare? Sul principio della cosa non ho nulla da > obiettare, ma modi e importo mi lasciano basito. > > Quanto spazio ho per rispondergli "sul principio sono d'accordo, se > davvero > risulta che ho sbagliato, ma quella somma scordatevela, facciamo 10 Euro e > pace"? E come? > > Grazie in anticipo per qualsiasi aiuto. > > Marco > > L'email che ho ricevuto: > > Sent via email to XXXXXXXXXXXX on April 22, 2025 > Authorization request / Unauthorized image use - Case no: > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx > Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXx > We, COPYTRACK, are writing to you on behalf of our client > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, > who > has assigned us the monitoring and protection of their licenses and image > rights. On April 17, 2025 we have been informed that XXXXXXXXXXXx is > likely > using an image without permission and the client has exclusively > commissioned > us with the clarification, administration of the image rights for the > territory > of the Federal Republic of Germany and, if necessary, the enforcement of > any > copyright infringement through our partner lawyers. Images are protected > by > copyright law almost worldwide and infringements are actionable under the > respective national law. Please see the attachment below for details. > On behalf of our client, we must first determine if you have a valid > license to > use the images in question in the territory of the Federal Republic of > Germany. > If you have a valid license or any other legal justification to use these > images, please reply to this email and include proof of license purchase > and/or > any other necessary information to validate the usage. > > Please note that you are obliged to provide the necessary information > about the > usage of the image to allow our client and us to verify the lawfulness of > such > usage. > > Please respond to this letter no later than May 2, 2025. > > If this is not the case, your use of the image material most likely > constitutes > a copyright infringement within the territory of the Federal Republic of > Germany. If no settlement can be reached, we as Copytrack are directly > instructed to enforce these rights for the territory in the Federal > Republic of > Germany through our German partner lawyers and, in addition, to instruct > our > respective partner lawyers in other countries to examine and, if > necessary, > enforce the infringement of the rights in the respective countries. You > could > then be legally obligated to compensate our client for the damage caused > by > this copyright infringement. > Rights XXXXXXXXXXXXx > holder > Image found on: URL OF POST > Online 2020 > Since > > 3 steps to solving your case > > In order to resolve this case amicably with you, we request your > cooperation. > Please complete the following steps to close this case: > > 1. Check > Review the evidence on this case by going to https:// > portal.copytrack.com https://portal.copytrack.com/ > and entering CASE ID XXXXXXXXXXXX > 2. Proof > Show us proof of your license by uploading it or providing any other > legal > justification to use these images and if it is valid, we will close > your > case immediately; > > If you do not have a valid license or any other valid justification: > > 3. Compensation / License > You now have the following 2 options: > Option 1: Purchase of a subsequent image license (includes past and > future use for one year after purchase). > Option 2: Compensation (includes the previous use and requires the > immediate deletion of the image). > > Image license (valid for 1 year from date of purchase) 389.59 € > Compensation costs (past usage) 350.00 € > Payment is due by May 21, 2025 > > Payments for both options can be made securely online at https:// > portal.copytrack.com by entering CASE ID XXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > We accept PayPal, credit card and bank transfer. > > We calculate these fees based on our client's license history, as well as > the > duration of use and type of rights infringement. Failure to provide a > proof or > pay for a valid license may result in your case being referred to our > partner > attorney and significantly higher additional fees. > > To avoid further action, including legal action, provide proof of a valid > license or any other relevant information by May 2, 2025, or acquire it > by > making payment in our online portal. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://server-nexa.polito.it/pipermail/nexa/attachments/20250422/ > 42ee0468/attachment-0001.htm> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:22:56 +0200 > From: Marco Fioretti <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [nexa] Aggiunta: urgente: pareri e consigli su richiesta > copytrack > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 16:10:10 PM +0000, Marco Fioretti wrote: > > > Inoltre, vedo online diversi "avvisi" che la compagnia in questione > adotta > > pratiche quantomeno discutibili: > > > > https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2024/10/11/ > > > > from-interview-series-to-legal-battle-yay-images-and-copytrack-come-after-the-brutally-honest-blog > > / > > > > https://kanzlei-franz.com/copytrack-scam-or-legitimate/ > > Aggiungo anche: > > https://www.rmndigital.com/ > > germany-must-prosecute-marcus-schmitt-of-copytrack-for-running-worldwide-cyber-extortion-racket > /
