I will look to see if we do..

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 24, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Thomas Fowler <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am an engineer chiming in.
>
> I have used this technique to clean up a signal.  Technically, it is  
> pretty simple to subtract out a "noise" signal.
> The hard part is getting a signal which is the exact "noise" you  
> want to subtract.  By exact I mean it has
> the equivalent gain, and timing and spectral content.  If it is in  
> the same frequency band as the target signal things
> get more difficult in a hurry.  Does anyone have multiple channel  
> recordings where the noise shows more prominently
> on one channel while the target bird shows better on another  
> channel?  I have Labview and can read *.wav files.  I would
> be willing to spend some time messing with this if someone can  
> provide a appropriate file.
>
> TomF
> retired Cornell Bioacoustics Engineer.
>
>
> At 01:00 AM 8/22/2009 -0400, you wrote:
>> Okay, last post for the night....
>>
>> The more I read about this, the more and more it sounds really cool.
>>
>> So, you software and hardware engineer people out there - what do  
>> you think? Can it work to better clean up night flight call data  
>> collection? Heck, this could get you closer to that 90-95% positive  
>> detection figure we'd all like to see.
>>
>> http://plaza.ufl.edu/badavis/EEL6502_Project_1.html
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Chris T-H
>>
>> Chris Tessaglia-Hymes wrote:
>>> I think the idea with adaptive noise cancellation is this:
>>>
>>> you have a dual microphone system. One channel is the primary  
>>> channel (collecting the target sounds). The second channel is the  
>>> "noise collection" channel. Through some mathematical algorithms,  
>>> you subtract the noise collected in the "noise" channel from the  
>>> primary channel (e.g., a different microphone aimed at collecting  
>>> the cricket sounds or the katydid sounds, perhaps using a slightly  
>>> lower gain setting, so as not to pick up distant flight calls  
>>> being collected in the primary channel). The resulting signal in  
>>> the primary channel should have reduced cricket and katydid  
>>> sounds. Well, that's the theory, I guess.
>>>
>>> Here's an older paper abstract from 1975. Current technology can  
>>> probably do this adaptive noise filtering in very real-time.
>>>
>>> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1451965
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Chris T-H
>

--
NFC-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_WELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_RULES

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
--

Reply via email to