Dan, Debbie, and All,

Thanks for the reference Dan. It is indeed an exciting paper that breaks new 
ground and raises intriguing questions. In reference to the paper’s conclusion 
about the need for larger-scale studies, I would add that there is a 
corresponding need for smaller-scale studies of aerial habitat, using smaller 
marine-type radar and acoustic monitoring.

 

In response to Debbie’s question, one of my sites is about 20 km inland and in 
a ravine with a river at the bottom and thus at very low elevation relative to 
the surrounding topography. Yet this site has relatively high counts of flight 
calls (in a dark forest environment) in the autumn. I hypothesize that this is 
due to migrants following the river system to the coast. At another site 
located on a coastal headland, I also have high counts in the autumn. Two 
stations that are 1.5 and 3.0 km from the headland have increasingly smaller 
counts with distance from the headland. Here I hypothesize the higher counts 
(and probably lower altitudes) at the headland are due to re-orientation 
behaviour.

 

John

 

Carleton, NS

 

 

From: dmenn...@gmail.com [mailto:dmenn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Joshua 
Mennill
Sent: December-05-16 12:37
To: Debbie Leick <dle...@mpgranch.com>; nfc-l@cornell.edu
Cc: John Kearney <john.kear...@ns.sympatico.ca>; Kate Stone 
<kst...@mpgranch.com>; Carrie Voss <cv...@mpgranch.com>
Subject: Re: [nfc-l] 2016 Fall NFC Update

 

All,

 

In relation to this question, there is an exciting new paper in the journal 
Biology Letters about the height of nocturnal migrants: "Where in the air? 
Aerial habitat use of nocturnally migrating birds" by Kyle Horton and 
colleagues.  The article reports a lot of variation in flight height of 
nocturnal migrants.  In relation to inland versus coastal habitat, the authors 
report: "migrants tended to fly slightly higher at inland sites compared with 
coastal sites during spring, but not during autumn."

 

Here is the full abstract.

 

The lower atmosphere (i.e. aerosphere) is critical habitat for migrant birds. 
This habitat is vast and little is known about the spatio-temporal patterns of 
distribution and abundance of migrants in it. Increased human encroachment into 
the aerosphere makes understanding where and when migratory birds use this 
airspace a key to reducing human–wildlife conflicts. We use weather 
surveillance radar to describe large-scale height distributions of nocturnally 
migrating birds and interpret these distributions as aggregate habitat 
selection behaviours of individual birds. As such, we detail wind cues that 
influence selection of flight heights. Using six radars in the eastern USA 
during the spring (2013–2015) and autumn (2013 and 2014), we found migrants 
tended to adjust their heights according to favourable wind profit. We found 
that migrants’ flight altitudes correlated most closely with the altitude of 
maximum wind profit; however, absolute differences in flight heights and height 
of maximum wind profit were large. Migrants tended to fly slightly higher at 
inland sites compared with coastal sites during spring, but not during autumn. 
Migration activity was greater at coastal sites during autumn, but not during 
spring. This characterization of bird migration represents a critical advance 
in our understanding of migrant distributions in flight and a new window into 
habitat selection behaviours.

 

Dan

 




Dan Mennill

Associate Professor

Chair, Biology Graduate Program

Department of Biological Sciences

University of Windsor

Email: dmenn...@uwindsor.ca <mailto:dmenn...@uwindsor.ca> 

Web: www.uwindsor.ca/dmennill <http://www.uwindsor.ca/dmennill> 

 

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Debbie Leick <dle...@mpgranch.com 
<mailto:dle...@mpgranch.com> > wrote:



Yes, makes me wonder, too. Do you have any sense of this from the monitoring 
you've done?

----------------
From: John Kearney
Sent: ‎12/‎2/‎2016 1:21 PM
To: 'Debbie Leick'; nfc-l@cornell.edu <mailto:nfc-l@cornell.edu> 
Cc: 'Kate Stone'; 'Carrie Voss'
Subject: RE: [nfc-l] 2016 Fall NFC Update

Hi Debbie,

Very interesting work. Low elevation in your area would be very high in a 
coastal area. It makes me wonder how the preferred flight altitude of a migrant 
is related to sea-level and local geography.

John



Carleton, NS



From: bounce-121048772-28417...@list.cornell.edu 
<mailto:bounce-121048772-28417...@list.cornell.edu>  
[mailto:bounce-121048772-28417...@list.cornell.edu 
<mailto:bounce-121048772-28417...@list.cornell.edu> ] On Behalf Of Debbie Leick
Sent: December-01-16 22:44
To: nfc-l@cornell.edu <mailto:nfc-l@cornell.edu> 
Cc: Kate Stone <kst...@mpgranch.com <mailto:kst...@mpgranch.com> >; Carrie Voss 
<cv...@mpgranch.com <mailto:cv...@mpgranch.com> >
Subject: [nfc-l] 2016 Fall NFC Update



Hi NFCers,

We posted a short update with preliminary results from our fall NFC monitoring. 
If you are interested in learning more about what we found in western Montana, 
please follow the link below:

http://www.mpgranch.com/research/latest-research/fall-migration-2016-acoustic-monitoring-update.aspx

Regards,

Debbie Leick

MPG Ranch

Florence, MT

--

NFC-L List Info:

 <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME> Welcome and Basics

 <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> Rules and Information

 <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> 
Subscribe, Configuration and Leave

Archives:

 <http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html> The Mail Archive

 <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> Surfbirds

 <http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> BirdingOnThe.Net

Please submit your observations to eBird <http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> !

--


--

NFC-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_WELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_RULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

--

NFC-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_WELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_RULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

 


--

NFC-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_WELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_RULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nfc-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Reply via email to