Hi Michael,
On 6/26/12 5:36, Michael Hare wrote:
> Hello-
>
> When using the aggregate function combined with csv output, # of flows
> for each record is not given as a column. Since aggregation seems to
> affect the csv output, is there a particular reason why that I haven't
> thought about, before I go about coding and submitting a patch?
No - this is a bug! The # of flows should appear in cvs. I will add it
regardless if aggregated or not. I did not thought of that.
- Peter
>
> Below example [somewhat] illustrates the issue.
>
> -Michael
>
> ////////////////
>
> nfdump -r nfcapd.201206252210 -o csv -a -A srcip4/8,dstip4/8 | wc -l
> 1601
>
> nfdump -r nfcapd.201206252210 -o csv | wc -l
> 52614
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Nfdump-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss
--
--
Be nice to your netflow data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Nfdump-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss
