Great, Gaspard!!! That's what I'm looking for. Thanks a lot for your help. I launch it this way.
nfcapd -w -D -l /netflow/spool/allflows -p 9996 If you see my output I don't get the "create" and "delete" events either, so there's something I'm doing wrong. Thanks a lot for your help Kind regards Octavio On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Gaspard Laurent <glaur...@guyacom.fr> wrote: > Hello Octavio, > > Thanks to the great set of tools provided by NFDump, I am succesfuly logging > ASR 1000 NEL records with nfcapd 1.6.13, see attached. > > Which arguments do you use to launch your nfcapd daemon? > > Best > Gaspard > > On 12 October 2016 at 05:56, Octavio Alfageme <octavio.alfag...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Sorry, by mistake, I sent the previous message as html. >> >> Thanks a lot, Peter. Unfortunately, I think that's not the case. Here you >> have an snapshot of a packet capture at the collector. As you can see there >> is a 'Timestamp' Jun 30, 2016 13:16:43.000000000 CEST. It's as nfdump had >> problems storing that information. >> >> Thank you >> >> Octavio >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Peter Haag <ph...@users.sourceforge.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> So it seems your device does not export any timestamps at all. >>> >>> 1970-01-01 means timestamp '0' >>> >>> - Peter >>> >>> On 12/10/16 09:09, Octavio Alfageme wrote: >>> > Dear all, >>> > >>> > I'm working with nfcapd version 1.6.13 and collecting Netflowv9 based >>> > CGNAT logs from a Cisco ASR1000. My linux machine running as a >>> > virtual-machine on vmware is properly synchronized by NTP. The ASR1000 is >>> > synchronized to the same reference and the >>> > sent Netflowv9 records have the right timestamps. I properly collect >>> > the Netflowv9 traffic coming from the router, but ,when I review the >>> > records, the date first seen and the duration are all "0s" and don't >>> > represent the timestamp of the received >>> > Netflowv9 based CGNAT records. >>> > >>> > [root@GRA-VS01 allflows]# nfdump -r nfcapd.201610031240 >>> > Date first seen Duration Proto Src IP Addr:Port Dst IP Addr:Port >>> > Packets Bytes Flows >>> > 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000 0.000 TCP 100.64.32.46:62651 >>> > <http://100.64.32.46:62651/> -> 17.146.1.72:443 <http://17.146.1.72:443/> >>> > 0 >>> > 0 1 >>> > 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000 0.000 UDP 100.64.48.86:36702 >>> > <http://100.64.48.86:36702/> -> 172.31.205.3:123 >>> > <http://172.31.205.3:123/> >>> > 0 0 1 >>> > 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000 0.000 UDP 172.30.41.5:62848 >>> > <http://172.30.41.5:62848/> -> 4.2.2.3:53 <http://4.2.2.3:53/> 0 0 1 >>> > 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000 0.000 UDP 172.30.41.4:58216 >>> > <http://172.30.41.4:58216/> -> 8.8.4.4:53 <http://8.8.4.4:53/> 0 0 1 >>> > >>> > I would be grateful if anyone could give me a hint about what is >>> > happening. >>> > >>> > Thanks in advance >>> > >>> > Kind regards >>> > >>> > Octavio >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>> > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Nfdump-discuss mailing list >>> > Nfdump-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss >>> > >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Nfdump-discuss mailing list >> Nfdump-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfdump-discuss mailing list Nfdump-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss