Oh that's good to hear. I'd also bumped up against the problem and had a few draft responses to support Dru's contentions that I hadn't gotten around to sending, so I'm glad that the issue has been identified.
It's not an earth shattering bug since there are workarounds, but they can get a little unwieldy in certain environments. Good job! Erik Ableson On 4 mai 09, at 18:11, Tom Haynes wrote: > Dru, > > Thanks for sticking with this - you are seeing behavior we all claim > is impossible to see. :-> > > I went looking in the code and sure enough it does do a reverse name > lookup. Only if that > lookup fails, it is supposed to use the hostname of "(anon)". Which, > combined with the > rules I provided, will allow your unamed machines access. > > I've spotted the place where the bug is occurring in > > > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/fs.d/nfs/mountd/mountd.c#getclientsnames > > > 573 /* > 574 * Get the client's hostname from the transport handle > 575 * If the name is not available then return "(anon)". > 576 */ > 577 void > 578 getclientsnames(SVCXPRT *transp, struct netbuf **nbuf, > 579 struct nd_hostservlist **serv) > 580 { > ... > 600 /* > 601 * Use the this API instead of the netdir_getbyaddr() > 602 * to avoid service lookup. > 603 */ > 604 if (__netdir_getbyaddr_nosrv(nconf, serv, *nbuf)) { > ... > 629 } > 630 freenetconfigent(nconf); > 631 } > > > At line 631, we don't do what the comment on lines 574-575 state we > should do. > > I'll file a bug against this, but that doesn't help you right now. > (If you want to file the bug, > let me know.) > > For my home configuration, I assign my router the ip: > > 192.168.1.1 > > And I assign my server the IP of 192.168.1.20. > > I then use named or even dhcpd on that server to assign both names > and IP to > the remaining computers in my house (most laptops, PSPs, Ninendo > DSes, iPhone, > etc use DHCP, the rest all get static IP). I configure all of my > clients to use the DNS > servers, in order: > > 192.168.1.20 > 192.168.1.1 > > > Would something like this suffice for you? I'm willing to help off- > list for you to get this going. > > Thanks, > Tom > _______________________________________________ > nfs-discuss mailing list > nfs-discuss at opensolaris.org
