Thanks for your replies. Spencer Shepler wrote: > If there is a desire to abstract dtrace providers into an nfsstat > interface, it may be best to leave it implemented in C. > Definitely makes sense to leave it in C for now.
-Piyush > Spencer > > On Jun 17, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Robert Gordon wrote: > > >> I'd __guess__ that nfsstat preexisted the kstat implementation.. >> >> robert. >> On Jun 17, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Piyush Shivam wrote: >> >> >>> I noticed that all the statistics that nfsstat outputs are >>> maintained as >>> kstat statistics in the kernel (unless I am missing something). Since >>> the kstat utility provides access to all the kstats from the command >>> line, I was wondering if there was any specific reason for >>> implementing >>> nfsstat in C and not as a script that leverages the kstat utility. Is >>> there some history or just a matter of preference? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piyush >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nfs-discuss mailing list >>> nfs-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> nfs-discuss mailing list >> nfs-discuss at opensolaris.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > nfs-discuss mailing list > nfs-discuss at opensolaris.org >
