So I want to confirm it is the desired result for NFSv4, is it? If so, maybe it breaks the consistence of mount operation.
Thanks, Tom Haynes wrote on 09/06/07 23:51: > Okay, I don't need traces. You are right that NFSv4's pseudo-fs is > letting you mount server:/a/b. > > The only mount call which will work from v2 or v3 is: > > # mount -o vers=3 ultralord:/a/b/c /mnt > > A way to check to see that a pseudo-fs is in play is to try the > following: > > On the server: > mkdir -p /a/b/c > mkdir /a/b/c1 > > On the client: > mount server:/a/b /mnt > ls -la /mnt > > And see if you can see c1 or not. > -- John Cui x82195
