Nicolas Williams wrote: >On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:30:44PM -0800, Darren.Reed at Sun.COM wrote: > > >>Luke Scharf wrote: >> >> >>>Why not just run a userland NFS daemon in the zones -- and follow the >>>existing security model? >>> >>>That makes all of the security model questions fall away -- and it >>>also gets fault isolation. There's a slight performance penalty, but >>>you're running a VM-ish environment anyway. >>> >>> >... > > >>With respect to performance, there isn't really any serious >>performance hit at all for applications running in a local zone. >>They interact directly with the kernel and disk, just like they >>would if they were running in the global zone. >> >> > >But we're talking about an NFS server in user-land > ...
Err, yes, the comment to which I replied made it sound like anything in a zone suffered from a performance hit because of the VM-likeness of it (or that's how I read it), which isn't true. Darren
