Sorry I was too busy last week to look at this. The change you propose is correct.
jim Pavel Filipensky wrote: > Hi, > > can I get a code review for 6861594 NFSv4 client Deadlock: cycle in > blocking chain at nfs4_move_mi > > Webrev: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~pavelf/6861594/ > > > Background: > > If there are two threads doing a failover for differnet mounts at the > same time, both of them need to grab > the s_lock for the new and the old nfs server. To prevent a deadlock > they must grab the s_locks it in the same order. > nfs4_move_mi() is not safe since it does not guarantee the same order > and allows the deadlock to happen. > > > > Thanks, > Pavel > > > _______________________________________________ > nfs-discuss mailing list > nfs-discuss at opensolaris.org
