Tom Haynes wrote: > Robert Thurlow wrote: >> Matt Cohen wrote:
>>> I've set the sharenfs property on this fs as follows: >>> sharenfs=rw=192.168.0.111,root=192.168.0.111 >> I would expect that this is because you're using the numeric >> address in the share on the Solaris server. > > We should still handle a single numeric address. > I've filed a bug against this behavior: > 6738223 Can not share a single IP address Agreed, but when that's fixed, would we not guide him to use this syntax instead? sharenfs=...@192.168.0.111,ro...@192.168.0.111 Rob T
