Hi list,

I have 2 servers which are directly connected via ixgbe based nics, both
running OpenSolaris 2009.06.

The actual network connection seems fine, iperf reports ~6.3 Gbits/sec
in terms of throughput and nicstat seems to agree that the nics are ~63%
utilized.   

Iperf : 
henrik at opensolaris:~# ./iperf-2.0.4/src/iperf -c 10.10.10.2 -N -t 40
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.10.10.2, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:   391 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 10.10.10.3 port 56583 connected with 10.10.10.2 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-40.0 sec  29.3 GBytes  6.29 Gbits/sec

Nicstat : 
henrik at naz01:/tmpfs# /export/home/henrik/nicstat -i ixgbe0 2
     Time      Int   rKB/s   wKB/s   rPk/s   wPk/s    rAvs    wAvs %Util Sat
21:13:02   ixgbe0  776175  1222.1 96592.9 18961.7  8228.4   66.00  63.7 83018.3
21:13:04   ixgbe0  773081  1217.2 96221.2 18885.3  8227.2   66.00  63.4 82717.5 

To measure the NFS throughput over this link I have created a tmpfs
filesystem on the server to avoid the synchronous writes issue as much
as possible.

Client : 
henrik at opensolaris:~# mount | grep /nfs
/nfs on 10.10.10.2:/tmpfs 
remote/read/write/setuid/devices/forcedirectio/xattr/dev=4dc0007 on Wed Aug  5 
20:06:25 2009

Server :
henrik at naz01:/tmpfs# share | grep tmpfs
-               /tmpfs   sec=sys,root=10.10.10.3   ""  

henrik at naz01:/tmpfs# mount | grep tmpfs
/tmpfs on swap read/write/setuid/devices/xattr/dev=4b80006 on Wed Aug  5 
21:59:31 2009

I have set the 'forcedirectio' option on the client mount to ensure that
the clients cache gets circumvented.

Using the randomwrite microbenchmark in filebench ($filesize set to 1gb)
I get :  

Local on tmpfs :
IO Summary:      5013937 ops, 82738.5 ops/s, (0/82738 r/w) 646.4mb/s, 71us 
cpu/op, 0.0ms latency

Tmpfs over NFS :
IO Summary:      383488 ops, 6328.2 ops/s, (0/6328 r/w)  49.4mb/s, 65us cpu/op, 
0.2ms latency

These are 2 fully populated 4 socket machines - why the extremely low
transfer speed ? 

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards

Henrik Johansen
henrik at scannet.dk
Tlf. 75 53 35 00

ScanNet Group
A/S ScanNet 


Reply via email to