cross-posting to nfs-discuss

On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Gary Gogick wrote:

> Heya all,
>
> I'm working on testing ZFS with NFS, and I could use some guidance -  
> read speeds are a bit less than I expected.
>
> Over a gig-e line, we're seeing ~30 MB/s reads on average - doesn't  
> seem to matter if we're doing large numbers of small files or small  
> numbers of large files, the speed seems to top out there.  We've  
> disabled pre-fetching, which may be having some affect on read  
> speads, but proved necessary due to severe performance issues on  
> database reads with it enabled.  (Reading from the DB with pre- 
> fetching enabled was taking 4-5 times as long than with it disabled.)

What is the performance when reading locally (eliminate NFS from the  
equation)?
  -- richard

>
> Write speed seems to be fine.  Testing is showing ~95 MB/s, which  
> seems pretty decent considering there's been no real network tuning  
> done.
>
> The NFS server we're testing is a Sun x4500, configured with a  
> storage pool consisting of 20x 2-disk mirrors, using separate SSD  
> for logging.  It's running the latest version of Nexenta Core.   
> (We've also got a second x4500 in with a raidZ2 config, running  
> OpenSolaris proper, showing the same issues with reads.)
>
> We're using NFS v4 via TCP, serving various Linux clients (the  
> majority are  CentOS 5.3).  Connectivity is presently provided by a  
> single gigabit ethernet link; entirely conventional configuration  
> (no jumbo frames/etc).
>
> Our workload is pretty read heavy; we're serving both website assets  
> and databases via NFS.  The majority of files being served are small  
> (< 1MB).  The databases are MySQL/InnoDB, with the data in separate  
> zfs filesystems with a record size of 16k.  The website assets/etc.  
> are in zfs filesystems with the default record size.  On the  
> database server side of things, we've disabled InnoDB's double write  
> buffer.
>
> I'm wondering if there's any other tuning that'd be a good idea for  
> ZFS in this situation, or if there's some NFS tuning that should be  
> done when dealing specifically with ZFS.  Any advice would be  
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary Gogick
> senior systems administrator  |  workhabit,inc.
>
> // email: gary at workhabit.com  |  web: http://www.workhabit.com
> // office: 866-workhabit  | fax: 919-552-9690
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to