CD wrote: > On 01/18/2010 06:36 PM, Tom Haynes wrote: >> CD wrote: >>> Greetings. >>> >>> I've go two pools, but can only access one of them from my >>> linux-machine. Both pools got the same settings and acl. >>> >>> Both pools has sharenfs=on. Also, every filesystem got >>> aclinherit=passthrough >>> NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE >>> tank sharenfs on local >>> bitbox sharenfs on local >>> >> >> Does 'zfs list' show bitbox to be at the root of the server's namespace? >> >> # zfs list -o name,sharenfs,mountpoint > NAME SHARENFS MOUNTPOINT > bitbox on /bitbox > bitbox/fs0 on /bitbox/fs0 > bitbox/fs1 on /bitbox/fs1 > rpool off /rpool > rpool/ROOT off legacy > rpool/ROOT/opensolaris off / > rpool/ROOT/xvm off /mnt/xvm > rpool/ROOT/xvm-1 off /mnt/xvm1 > rpool/dump - - > rpool/export off /export > rpool/export/home off /export/home > rpool/swap - - > tank on /tank > tank/fs0 on /tank/fs0 > tank/fs1 on /tank/fs2 > > Hmm, tank/fs1 is mounted on /tank/fs2. Do you also have a /tank/fs1? I.e., the shares down below don't match the paths.
This shouldn't be the problem you are seeing... >> >> What does share show as the active shares? >> >> # share > - at tank /tank rw "" > - at tank /tank/fs0 rw "" > - at tank /tank/fs1 rw "" > f...@tank/fs0 /tank/fs0 rw "" > f...@tank/fs1 /tank/fs1 rw "" > >> >> If you don't see bitbox here, it will be a problem. > Seems I've got a problem ^^ > But what? Aren't the filesystem handling the sharing? Yes, they should be. I'm adding zfs-discuss to see what further triaging will help. > > I've got samba shares active for most of my filesystems - can this be > a problem? >> >>> Same ACL: >>> /bitbox >>> drwxr--r--+ 25 root sa 25 Dec 18 12:43 folder0 >>> group:sa:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> owner@:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> everyone@:r-----a-R-c---:-------:allow >>> drwxr--r--+ 3 root sa 3 Jun 1 2009 folder1 >>> group:sa:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> owner@:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> everyone@:r-----a-R-c---:-------:allow >>> >>> /tank >>> drwxr--r--+ 4 root root 4 Sep 9 15:47 folder0 >>> group:sa:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> owner@:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> everyone@:r-----a-R-c---:-------:allow >>> drwxr--r--+ 7 root sa 9 May 19 2009 folder1 >>> group:sa:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> owner@:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow >>> everyone@:r-----a-R-c---:-------:allow >>> >>> Yet, when I mount the nfs, only 'tank' is listed: >>> mount -t nfs4 srv:/ /mnt/server >>> >>> If I try to mount the pools separately: >>> $ sudo mount -t nfs4 srv:/tank /mnt/tank/ --work perfectly >>> $ sudo mount -t nfs4 srv:/bitbox /mnt/bitbox --gives error: >>> mount.nfs4: mounting srv:/bitbox failed, reason given by server: >>> No such file or directory >> >> What if you try a v3 mount? > I assmume the prefix "-t nfs" equls v3? I get: > mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting srv:/bitbox You don't need "-t nfs", just dropping the -t option will work. But the fact that we don't see a share means we do not expect to get access here. >> >> >>> I don't get it! >>> Also, where are the config files, such as the /etc/export? >>> >> >> If this were non-zfs, you'd want to look in /etc/dfs. But since this >> is zfs, the share >> (i.e., export) is in the sharenfs property of the filesystem. >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks! >> >> >> > Thanks for replying.
