> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Gryniewicz [mailto:d...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:42 AM > To: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Multiple-fd work > > On 07/27/2015 12:33 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > > <snip> > > Is there a reason we can't just pass state_t to the FSAL on the correct calls? > That seems the simplest, most straight forward way to do this.
We still need to be able to allocate an FSAL specific structure to the state_t. And that is all that the FSAL would actually look at (well, ok, I MIGHT look at state_type to understand a bit better what it needs to do. But ultimately, what the fsal cares about is it's "thing". I'm happy to rename the "thing" something other than fsal_fd. How about fsal_state_private or something like that? Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
