> Can't we somehow use pthread_cleanup_push() for this purpose?
> Of course, having our own cleanup handler would be flexible, but wondering
> if we really need this.
> 
> Regards, Malahal.

I looked at that, but no, pthread_cleanup_push() needs to be followed by
pthread_cleanup_pop()...

Frank

> Dirk Jagdmann [d...@cubic.org] wrote:
> > So I've implemented a minimal solution that works for my use case.
> > First this is the new public API, which can be used to register a
> > thread cleanup callback
> > function:
> >
> > /**
> >   * type of a callback function that will be called when a thread exits.
> >   * Use the fridgethr_register_thread_cleanup_cb() function to register
> >   * the callback function *for each thread* you want it called at
> >   * thread exit.
> >   */
> > typedef void (*thread_cleanup_cb) (void*);
> >
> > /**
> >   * register a callback function that will be called when the current
thread
> exits.
> >   *
> >   * You can only register a callback function once per thread for each
> >   * unique param value.  Subsequent calls of this function with the
> >   * same value for cb and param will not register additional callbacks.
> >   *
> >   * @param cb pointer to callback function.
> >   * @param param parameter that will be passed to cb.
> >   */
> > void fridgethr_register_thread_cleanup_cb(thread_cleanup_cb cb, void
> > *param);
> >
> >
> > This feature is implemented with a linked list with the nodes
> > containing the thread_cleanup_cb pointer and the param pointer. Each
> > thread maintains its own linked list with a thread local glist_head. A
new
> function:
> >
> > /**
> >   * call every registered thread cleanup callback function.
> >   */
> > static void fridgethr_call_cleanup_cb();
> >
> > will traverse the linked list and call every registered cleanup
> > function. This new fridgethr_call_cleanup_cb function is called in
> > fridgethr_start_routine() before the thread_finalize function is called.
> >
> > I'll do some more testing during this week, to see that my
> > implementation is working. If you like the general idea, I'll post a
> > review request later with my changes.
> >
> > --
> > ---> Dirk Jagdmann
> > ----> http://cubic.org/~doj
> > -----> http://llg.cubic.org
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------- _______________________________________________
> > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
> > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
> >
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one
place.
> SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
> Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
in one place.
SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Reply via email to