On 10/29/2015 08:29 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 10/28/2015 02:55 PM, Frank Filz wrote: >> We have had various discussions over the years as to how to best handle out >> of memory conditions. > > a) I see that, e.g., jemalloc's mallctl(3) has the ability to > selectively purge unused dirty pages from one or all arenas. > > I don't know what that actually means in this case. Maybe it means that > a malloc() call might succeed on a retry after purging? > > Then my only concern is that while Fedora and EPEL builds of nfs-ganesha > are made _with_ jemalloc, our downstream RHGS product is _not_ built > with jemalloc. >
I see now that glibc has mallopt() and malloc_trim(). -- Kaleb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
