I was just busy, and no other reason. We should apply all applicable commits from ganltc repo to upstream v2.3. I will do it when I return from my vacation if it wasn't done by then.
Regards, Malahal. On Sep 27, 2016 6:47 PM, "Soumya Koduri" <skod...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 09/27/2016 06:26 PM, Malahal Naineni wrote: > >> I did find an issue with merging locks. Please see if a fix around this >> area in ganltc repo, branch "ibm2.3" would fix your issue or not. It was >> reviewed by Frank a while ago but I didn't apply to the upstream stable >> v2.3 yet. >> >> Thanks Malahal. yes. I think its below commit - > > commit a27663e3346019ddcd9e169182d66714ddb55890 > Author: Malahal Naineni <mala...@us.ibm.com> > Date: Thu Jun 2 12:19:50 2016 -0500 > > Fix checking for existence of prior locks. > > It does fix the issue which we have seen. Any particular reason why it was > not considered for V2.3 branch? > > Thanks, > Soumya > > Regards, Malahal. >> >> >> On Sep 27, 2016 6:14 PM, "Soumya Koduri" <skod...@redhat.com >> <mailto:skod...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We observed a ref leak of cache-inode entry (in V2.3-stable >> codepath) in case if there are multiple locks issued on that entry >> which may get merged. Attached the fix for it. >> >> Kindly review and merge it into V2.3-stable branch. >> >> Thanks, >> Soumya >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list >> Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel >> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel> >> >> >>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
