Dan, In cache_inode_rename, we did a lookup of both the old name and the new name, and refreshed attributes on both objects.
In mdcache, I'm not sure we invalidate the attributes of mdc_lookup_dst (if any, the object that is unlinked as a result of rename onto it). What this results in is that a rename of a file causes us to not reflect the updated ctime to the client. I think we need to do an mdc_try_get_cached on old name, and if that results in a cached object, to invalidate it's attributes. Similarly, if mdc_lookup_dst is non-NULL, we need to invalidate it's attributes (if it had multiple hard links, a rename over it should change it's ctime also). If we just evict it from cache, then that works also. What do you think? Anyone else have thoughts? Thanks Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
