Dev versions of FSAL_RGW have pretty much always required dev versions of Ceph. I believe the backports for the ceph fixes are in the works.
Matt? Daniel On 04/22/2017 08:54 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Just an FYI, > > building against Ceph 10.2.7 in Fedora rawhide (f27) the build fails. > > Details at > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5601/19135601/build.log > > versus ganesha-2.4.5 which does build. > > I'm guessing that this might be a Ceph 10 versus 11 or 12 thing? branto tried > to build Ceph 11.2 back in February, but it failed and there's been no > activity around Ceph 11 or Ceph 12 since then. > > Looks like we need to do something a little different in our development > strategy around Ceph RGW.) > > -- > > Kaleb > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
