Hi Sachin, I'm pretty sure no decisions are made based on these values, they were added for diagnostics. I think you're probably right, however. I'd defer to the folks working on refactoring this part of the code as to whether these should or will exist in the medium-term future.
Matt ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sachin Punadikar" <punadikar.sac...@gmail.com> > To: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 3:46:45 AM > Subject: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] RPC queue enqueued/dequeued counter size > > Hi, > Recently I came across below 2 counters for RPC queue. > static uint32_t enqueued_reqs; > static uint32_t dequeued_reqs; > > Shouldn't the counter size be uint64_t ? > Having size as uint32_t will allow the counters to grow until 4294967295. > Increasing the size would help production environments. > > -- > with regards, > Sachin Punadikar > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-821-5101 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel