On 8/8/17 1:58 PM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
On 08/08/2017 01:17 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
NSM should be accessible by TCP. Why are we using UDP?
Is there a downstream need?
Yes, there is a downstream need for NSM.
Would prefer folks answer the question asked. I didn't ask about NSM.
Note the lack of a question mark....
It very explicitly asked:
"Why are we using UDP? Is there a downstream need?"
AFAICT from grep'ing the NFS documents, NFSv3 NSM *MUST* support TCP.
We do not support NFSv2. We should be using TCP.
Do we have a downstream need for NFSv2 support for NSM only?
If not, I'm going to drop this unsupported and frankly kludgy code.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
