Hi Bill,

Are you planning to pull this into the next ganesha RC?

Thanks,
Pradeep

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 7:13 AM, William Allen Simpson <
william.allen.simp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/27/18 4:07 PM, Pradeep wrote:
>
>> ​Here is what I see in the log (the '2' is what I added to figure out
>> which recv failed):
>> nfs-ganesha-199008[svc_948] rpc :TIRPC :WARN :svc_vc_recv: 0x7f91c0861400
>> fd 21 recv errno 11 (try again) 2 176​
>>
>> The fix looks good. Thanks Bill.
>>
>> Thanks for the excellent report.  I wish everybody did such well
> researched reports!
>
> Yeah, the 2 isn't really needed, because I used "svc_vc_wait" and
> "svc_vc_recv" (__func__) to differentiate the 2 messages.
>
> This is really puzzling, since it should never happen.  It's the
> recv() with NO WAIT.  And we are level-triggered, so we shouldn't be
> in this code without an event.
>
> If it needed more data, it should be WOULD BLOCK, but it's giving
> EAGAIN.  No idea what that means here.
>
> Hope it's not happening often....
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Reply via email to