On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 05:45 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote: > On 2/24/18 5:18 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > > On 2/24/18 4:42 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > > > [top post for visibility] > > > > > > Says ntirpc pullup (twice), but doesn't actually have: > > > * "Pullup NTIRPC through #106" > > > > > > Missing "(nfs41.h) unindent" checkpatch cleanup, even though we'd > > > agreed this was the best time to do it, and it had all the expected > > > +1 and +2. Literally no changes to running code, so why? > > > > > > > So I rebased on this tag, and our CI compile fails: > > > > error: Failed build dependencies: > > libcephfs-devel >= 10.2.0 is needed by > > nfs-ganesha-2.7-dev.1.el7.centos.x86_64 > > > > But success for CI CentOS cthon04 and CEA 9P and pynfs! > > So who is able to update the trigger-fsal_gluster CI? > > Do we need a separate trigger-fsal_ceph CI? >
Bah, that was my breakage. We can back out that specfile patch for now if it helps. I guess we still require some sort of conditional in the specfile. How old is the distro where this is being built? -- Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
