Hmm... that's pretty contrary to this presentation. You are saying I need SAS because otherwise it will take a long time for the report to run, but not because SATA will not keep up with the data capture correct?
-Max http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-50/presentations/ripe50-plenary-tue-nfsen-nfdump.pdf On 2/27/07, Tristan RHODES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With that amount of data, you are going to need the speed of SAS. We > have less data, and we are running OK on ATA drives. Even so, it still > takes several minutes for queries to display, even if we have only > selected a few hours of data to look through. The faster the drive, the > better experience you will have with NFSEN. > > Tristan Rhodes > > >>> "Max Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/26/07 3:59 PM >>> > Hi all, > > I am in need of some real-world feedback on disk requirements > (specifically speed) necessary to properly power a NFSEN system. We > are currently capturing ~30GB of data per day (obviously we can figure > out the total size requirements based on the number of days we want to > capture) - I am more interested in SATA vs. SAS at this point for the > drive medium. > > Thanks, > Max > > -- > Max Clark > http://www.clarksys.com > > > -- Max Clark http://www.clarksys.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nfsen-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
