On Wed, 03 Oct 2007, at 08:54, Peter Haag wrote:
> Werner - take Adrian's statement as it is. It says, that the setup he has > takes this > amount of time for the job. It only supports the statement, that DBs need to > be > highly optimized. I've talked to many people doing netflow storage on DBs, > and it's > not a piece of cake. Most of them did not have several TB of data, as we > have, for > example. > Having netflow in a DB is tricky, but nonetheless doable. btw, a number of netflow vendors use a mixture of rdbm + binary storage for their commercial products: flat files for quick access of short lived raw data, with longer term data / stats / tops over time etc indexed in a db ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Nfsen-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
