Hi Borja, I see tos 0 too. When I capture packets before and after nprobe I see packets with TOS on it. I'm sure 100%:
14:21:23.236494 IP (tos 0xb8, ttl 126, id 4388, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 450) 217.xx.xx.xx.47460 > 64.xx.xx.xx.https: Flags [P.], cksum 0x5af4 (correct), seq 949:1359, ack 84, win 256, length 410 -----Original Message----- From: Borja Marcos [mailto:bor...@sarenet.es] Sent: mercoledì 8 ottobre 2014 12:16 To: Oliver Lagni Cc: nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nfsen-discuss] Nfsen-discuss Digest, Vol 100, Issue 2 On Oct 8, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Oliver Lagni wrote: > Hi Giles, > > Thanks for your help. > > Actually TOS values on NFSEN are from 1 to 255 so I guess I could filter with > same decimal value of DSCP, but it's not. > The only TOS filter that works is TOS 0 ;) > > At the moment I'm using this filter: tos 0xb8 or tos 184 or tos 5 but I > can't see anything. It is working for me, seeing best effort at tos=0 and making tos comparisons. Check your flows source, maybe it's not sending the information properly, my flows come from Juniper M and MX routers. Borja. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Nfsen-discuss mailing list Nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss