Hi Borja, 

I see tos 0 too. 
When I capture packets before and after nprobe I see packets with TOS on it. 
I'm sure 100%:

14:21:23.236494 IP (tos 0xb8, ttl 126, id 4388, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP 
(6), length 450)
    217.xx.xx.xx.47460 > 64.xx.xx.xx.https: Flags [P.], cksum 0x5af4 (correct), 
seq 949:1359, ack 84, win 256, length 410



-----Original Message-----
From: Borja Marcos [mailto:bor...@sarenet.es] 
Sent: mercoledì 8 ottobre 2014 12:16
To: Oliver Lagni
Cc: nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nfsen-discuss] Nfsen-discuss Digest, Vol 100, Issue 2


On Oct 8, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Oliver Lagni wrote:

> Hi Giles, 
> 
> Thanks for your help. 
> 
> Actually TOS values on NFSEN are from 1 to 255 so I guess I could filter with 
> same decimal value of DSCP, but it's not. 
> The only TOS filter that works is TOS 0 ;)
> 
> At the moment I'm using this filter:  tos 0xb8 or tos 184 or tos 5  but I 
> can't see anything. 

It is working for me, seeing best effort at tos=0 and making tos comparisons. 

Check your flows source, maybe it's not sending the information properly, my 
flows come from Juniper M and MX routers.




Borja.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Nfsen-discuss mailing list
Nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss

Reply via email to