Hi Guys,

I appreciate very much your answers.

Using numfmt --to-si I got the same value between nfsen and nfdump.

And about cacti, that was the point. I forgot that I'm getting the flows
from the input interface on my distribution layer. So it won't count
traffic like broadcast, arp, netbios and so on.

Thank you a lot Guys.

Regards

Robson



On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Adrian Popa <adrian.popa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> One extra non-obvious thing - depending on the router configuration it's
> possible that netflow only processes ipv4 traffic, so ipv6 will remain
> uncounted.
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lambert Hoogeveen <lambe...@clear.net.nz>
> wrote:
>
>> Another one to consider is sampling.
>> If you're using this then that could be another reason for the disparity.
>>
>> Still, the answers from Brian and Adrian are the most likely cause though.
>> The way traffic is counted is fundamentally different between Cacti and
>> Netflow.
>> Cacti reads the SNMP interface statistics (which includes ALL traffic
>> down to Layer2), the Netflow collector looks at the exported IP Netflow
>> packets.
>> Taking all this into account, there are going to be differences between
>> the two.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lambert
>>
>>
>> On 07/06/17 01:07, Brian Candler wrote:
>> > On 06/06/2017 13:25, nfsen-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>> >> At this point, I got some divergence of data comparing
>> >> Cacti/nfsen/nfdump,
>> >> e.g:
>> >>
>> >> timeslot Jun 02 2017 - 11:55 - Jun 02 2017 - 15:50
>> >> cacti: 650G
>> >> nfsen: 617G
>> >> nfdump: 575G
>> >
>> > nfsen just runs nfdump to show and aggregate flows. In fact, if you
>> > look at the bottom section of the screen, it gives you the exact
>> > nfdump command line it runs.  So comparing the command line you ran
>> > with the command line nfsen ran may help.
>> >
>> > If you're post-processing the output from nfdump, you might can use
>> > the '-N' option to get figures printed as byte counts rather scaled to
>> > different units.
>> >
>> > Actually, unit scaling appears to be one of your problems. Notice that
>> > 575GiB (575x1024^3) is the same as 617GB (617*1000^3).  Use numfmt
>> > --to-si instead of --to-iec to make them match (*)
>> >
>> > As for the difference with Cacti: firstly, are you adding in and out
>> > together? Otherwise you'll need to configure your nfdump queries with
>> > filters to separate inbound and outbound traffic.
>> >
>> > Other differences can be due to nfcapd showing flows which don't pass
>> > through the interface which Cacti is monitoring, or vice versa - this
>> > isn't usually a problem if you're talking about a router interface
>> > rather than a switch interface.
>> >
>> > It can also be to do with the handling of long-lived flows.  For
>> > example, there could be a long flow which was in progress at 15:50
>> > (like a long download) which hadn't completed.
>> >
>> > You didn't say what router you're using, but if you configure it to
>> > expire flows after 5 minutes, usually you'll find the flow data aligns
>> > better with Cacti.
>> >
>> > Another possibility is to do with packet headers: that is, maybe your
>> > Cacti interface counters are counting the full frames with ethernet
>> > headers, and nfdump is just looking at the IP packets.
>> >
>> > Yet another possibility is non-IP traffic traversing the interface,
>> > which Cacti will count but nfdump won't. (This includes ARP, along
>> > with rarities like Netbeui, IPX and IS-IS).  You might also find that
>> > your router doesn't generate flows for broadcast traffic, but the
>> > interface counters will count it.
>> >
>> > If you want to pin this down, set up a "quiet" test network, read the
>> > interface counters with snmpwalk, send a known number of test packets
>> > of known size, and check again.  Compare with the flow data you receive.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Brian.
>> >
>> > (*) It is arguable which is correct to use for this application.
>> >
>> > Communication systems always use power-of-ten units: e.g. 64Kbps is
>> > 64,000 bits per second, and gigabit ethernet is 1,000,000,000 bits per
>> > second.  The nfdump manpage says it uses multiples of 1000.
>> >
>> > Computers traditionally use power-of-two units, especially for RAM.
>> > However, hard drive manufacturers use power-of-ten units, since a
>> > 500GB drive sounds better than 465GiB.
>> >
>> > So you have to be clear which you're using.  If you are charging per
>> > GB, tell your users whether this means 1000x1000x1000 bytes or
>> > 1024x1024x1024 bytes.
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> >
>> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Nfsen-discuss mailing list
>> > Nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
>> >
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nfsen-discuss mailing list
>> Nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Nfsen-discuss mailing list
> Nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfsen-discuss mailing list
Nfsen-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss

Reply via email to