The Program to Mask Society is a Grotesque Governmental Manipulation of a Frightened and Confused Public.From 9/11 to Covid-19: Watching as the CDC and NIST Destroy Their Own Reputations https://www.globalresearch.ca/watching-cdc-nist-destroy-own-reputations/5724421
By Prof. Bill Willers <https://www.globalresearch.ca/author/bill-willers> Global Research, September 23, 2020 Region: USA <https://www.globalresearch.ca/region/usa> Theme: Media Disinformation <https://www.globalresearch.ca/theme/media-disinformation>, Science and Medicine <https://www.globalresearch.ca/theme/science-and-medicine> <https://www.globalresearch.ca/watching-cdc-nist-destroy-own-reputations/5724421#> <https://www.globalresearch.ca/watching-cdc-nist-destroy-own-reputations/5724421?print=1> 38 20 7 94 *“Anyone who believes anything the US government says is gullible beyond the meaning of the word.” –Paul Craig Roberts, <https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/11/07/another-fake-bin-laden-story-paul-craig-roberts/>2014* *The dramatic reversal in official U.S. policy regarding facial masking is epitomized by, first, the May, 2020 report <https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article> of the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in which facial masks are acknowledged to be ineffective in blocking viral transmission, this followed two months later by CDC’s inexplicable July, 2020 recommendation <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover-guidance.html> that the public be masked. The earlier report was based on a review of 14 randomized controlled trials and reviews since 1982. The radical change two months later was based on nothing that could in any way negate the dozens of earlier studies.* On the July, 2020 web page, a heading, ‘Evidence for Effectiveness of Wearing Masks’, shows a ridiculous artist’s rendition of the now familiar spiked spheres indicating viruses bouncing off a cloth surface like pingpong balls off concrete (although the text states “droplets”). It is a visual lie, purposeful and unforgivable. A link to “emerging evidence” of mask efficacy leads to a bibliography of 19 “Recent Studies” (scroll down). It is difficult to explain to non-scientists what do, and what do not, qualify as bona fide scientific studies, but, just to make a point, the first listed in this CDC bibliography is a report based on a single asymptomatic infection. This might qualify as an item to incorporate into a study, but it is not in itself a “study” by the 17 (no kidding) listed authors. The other 18 (on the website’s August 7, 2020, “update”) consist primarily of reports of viral loads, the prevalence of asymptomatic patients, “presumed” transmission in a family of 5, rates of spread, fabric filtration efficiency, even laser light visualization of oral droplets (really). Only 4 deal with masks per se, and not one comes close to making a case for the efficacy of public masking. One actually ends with the authors support of “…. surgical mask use as one of the recommended cough etiquette interventions” [their term]. Etiquette? Check them out (scroll down) <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover-guidance.html#recent-studies>. The list, a pathetically limp effort by the CDC to justify its indefensible authorization of public masking, does absolutely nothing to overturn years of studies that, in sum, show public masking to be ineffective in preventing transmission of viruses. There are no new definitive scientific studies yielding the claimed <https://pbswisconsin.org/watch/here-and-now/epidemiologist-stresses-evidence-based-prevention-strategies/> “…. hard evidence that risk of transmission goes down dramatically when people wear masks.” The Sudden Reversal on Facial Masks: Mandated Public Masking in Wisconsin, USA <https://www.globalresearch.ca/mandated-public-masking-wisconsin-usa/5723724> Masks, and only those of a professional grade, are intended specifically as protection for health professionals dealing with infected patients likely to spread pathogens in aerosol form. The program to mask society is a grotesque governmental manipulation of a frightened and confused public. The CDC, by its hawking of the public masking charade, betrays the public trust. The situation absolutely reeks of a concealed project of global scale, and if serious investigative journalism were a norm, there would be reporters all over the apparent political connections like flies on rotting meat. Instead, we have major media intent on eclipsing a vast source, authoritative but suppressed, of anything that counters the totalitarian “official narrative”. The contemporary situation regarding the CDC and media is not unique. In 2009, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson reported <https://www.cbsnews.com/news/swine-flu-cases-overestimated/> on CBS that the CDC suddenly advised against testing for H1N1 “Swine Flu” virus (in disregard of its federal mandate) after having declared it an epidemic. The professed reason for the reversal was that further tracking during a known epidemic would waste resources. In an interview by Jon Rappoport <https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/17/to-trump-aides-you-have-no-idea-how-deep-the-cdc-scandals-go/>, Attkisson added that she learned through the Freedom of Information Act that before the CDC halted testing, nearly none of the cases that had been reported as H1N1 had actually been Swine Flu, or any flu at all. And what then? CBS, and news media generally, ignored her discovery and continued to claim a Swine Flu epidemic. Attkisson summed up with “We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype [and] it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.” There is now a doubling down on enforcement of public masking. Here, September 16, 2020 on C-Span <https://www.c-span.org/video/?475764-1/coronavirus-vaccine-widely-late-2021-cdc-director>, is CDC Director Robert Redfield [skip to 1:04:40] testifying before Congress: “Face masks are the most important powerful public health tool we have ….. We have clear scientific evidence they work, and they are our best defense. I might even go so far as to say that this face mask [he holds up a standard cloth mask] is more guarantee to protect me against Covid than when I take a Covid vaccine, because the immunogenicity may be 70%, and if I don’t get an immune response, the vaccine’s not going to protect me. This mask will.” According to decades of scientific studies, the statement by the CDC Director is pure fabrication. *Click on the link for the rest.* --- Support News from Underground: http://bit.ly/NFUSupport You received this email because you are subscribed to News from Underground. To unsubscribe from this email list, please go to: http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=pIdjNUgiG2h8yxbhC54SSy4SEskAoEMs For archives, please go to: http://archives.simplelists.com/nfu
