>From my righteous brother in Chicago:

>
> Dear Mr. Barker-
>
>
>
> I am a relatively new subscriber, and a refugee from the *New York
> Times, *a paper I read for 38 years. I ceased reading it because of its
> panic-inspiring presentations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis. No doubt writing an
> email like this is a quixotic undertaking, as I've emailed reporters before
> (not many editors) and if I get an answer at all it is simply a recitation
> of what I've already read that prompted my email. I did get a long response
> from the editor of the *Chronicle of Higher Education *who was willing to
> consider what I had to say.
>
>
>
> I realize there is a certain orthodoxy in reporting about COVID, and that
> many newspapers share certain principles, articles of faith, really, that
> have no firm scientific basis, but are repeated ad nauseam until the
> whole world is swaying to the music of those frightening, hypnotic and dire
> words of warning and threat.
>
>
>
> I read this sentence in your newspaper today:
>
> "fatigue with social-distancing rules and mask wearing has been one of the
> main drivers of infections in Europe's second wave." There is absolutely no
> scientific basis for this assertion.
>
> As for masks, the Dutch government recently announced they would not
> impose a mask mandate, and there are other countries that have rejected
> that approach as well. Oxford University's Center for Evidence Based
> Medicine (CEBM) is an invaluable source of information for anyone writing
> about the crisis. That is, for anyone who sincerely wishes to "follow the
> science."
>
> https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/
>
>
>
> There is no evidence masks block the transmission of airborne viruses, and
> in some cases (see the Hanoi Hospital study from 2015
> https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.short) such as with hospital
> workers wearing cloth masks, the masks made flu infection of the wearers
> much more likely.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, what is meant by "infections" involves a real sleight of
> hand, since PCR test positive results depend on the cycle threshold used in
> the test, the higher the number the more people who are not infectious test
> positive.
>
> https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/
> <https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/>
>
>
>
> I am sure you know all this already and I am sure none of this will change
> what is published in the *Times*, the *WSJ*, the *Washington Post, *but,
> you do the country a great disservice by enabling the lockdowns that have
> destroyed our economy and countless lives. I recently learned of an annual
> conference (AUP  Association of University Presses) that will be held
> virtually in *June, 2021. *In light of the great public fear, what a
> French philosopher as described as "bioterror," what will become of our
> downtown business districts, our transit systems, our workers, the
> remaining (and struggling) retail stores? I urge you to consider the truly
> dire consequences of your actions in fueling public fear and aiding
> political leaders who impose damaging and medically questionable measures
> without public consent.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Bruce Joshua Miller
>
> Miller Trade Book Marketing
>
> http://millertradebook.com <http://millertradebook.com/about.html>
>
> @brucejquiller
>
> https://brucejquiller.wordpress.com/
>
---

Support News from Underground: http://bit.ly/NFUSupport

You received this email because you are subscribed to News from Underground. To 
unsubscribe from this email list, please go to: 
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=pIdjNUgiG2h8yxbhC54SSy4SEskAoEMs

For archives, please go to: http://archives.simplelists.com/nfu

Reply via email to