>From Michael Green: > The only reason to spend time on Jon Rapport’s argument is that it > distracts from the undisputable facts and should be quashed to avoid > wasting more time. > We all agree that, if there is a SARS-CoV-2, it presents at most a minor > medical challenge that has already been solved, and is being used as a > pretext to shape the world into a medical martial law dystopia veering > toward constant monitoring, tracking and control via external and internal > devices powered by 5-G while wealth is extracted upwards. There was > never a political point for 9/11 researchers to argue about whether a plane > hit the Pentagon when all agreed that there was overwhelming interlocking > convergent evidence that the Towers and B7 were taken down by controlled > demolition, which implies the Big Picture on which we all agreed: 9/11 was > a major false flag meant to reshape the world and should have been our sole > focus. > > Meryl Nass hasn’t paid sufficient attention to Jon Rappoport’s argument to > appreciate how defective it is. Jon’s entire argument regarding the CDC > document rests on a slanted systematic misreading of its text that becomes > a deranged chant that the CDC as much as admits that it had no isolate of > the SARS-CoV-2 virus. > https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/ > > > The CDC document simply states that it does not have a quantified isolate > of the virus—i.e., it does not know the amount that it has—and it needs to > know the minimal amount required to detect the virus with circa 95% > sensitivity, so instead it is using a sample of full-length RNA of known > density (titer) to determine that minimal amount. The CDC states that it > wants to: > > …determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which > approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. …Since > no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, > assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with > characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; > GenBank accession: MN908947.2) *of known titer (RNA copies/μL) *( > *emphasis* added) https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download > > The CDC never says or implies that it lacks an isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus; > it says only that it does not know how much it has so cannot determine the > minimal amount needed to detect it reliably (95% sensitivity). Please > read the original Oct 8, 2020 Rappoport article in detail and compare it > with the CDC statement. I am no friend of the CDC, whose criminal > skullduggery in generating this faux plague is legion. > > Meryl says that Kaufman is science-light but doesn’t say quite enough how. > I have endured enough Andrew Kaufman MD interviews and articles to risk > sounding foolish or doing him an injustice. Kaufman’s key objections > rely on applying Koch’s Postulates, so he argues even when a new virus is > isolated this doesn’t prove it causes COVID—this is Rappoport’s SOUP > objection—until and unless it is isolated and used to infect someone who > then comes down with the same disease. Kaufman fails to recognize that > we can skip that step if there is a distinct clinical syndrome from whose > victims that new virus is reliably extracted and identified and there is > and has been. Kaufman’s dotty ideas that it might be something toxic > fail before the facts. Consider a great honest practitioner like Didier > Raoult, whose studies routinely showed using (fallible!) PCR testing that > the virus was quickly cleared by HCQ + antibiotic, and of course even > better with Zelenko’s zinc added. See also Kristian Anderson’s “The > proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” that gives the precise genetic make-up > including a gross insertion of 12 nucleotides into the virus genetic code > that was needed to produce the furin cleavage site allowing the virus to > enter the host cell. (Anderson performs the disinformation miracle of > declaring this potent evidence of SARS-CoV-2 being a bioweapon—the codon > insertions that belongs to no near relative of this virus—to mean just the > opposite, that the virus naturally evolved.) Nature Medicine | VOL 26 | > April 2020 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9 So, it’s a > virus, and easily treatable, and a thin reed on which the NWO is now so > firmly perched for the vast majority of its victims. > > Michael Green > > > ---
Support News from Underground: https://bit.ly/NFUSupport Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com You received this email because you are subscribed to News from Underground. To unsubscribe from this email list, please go to: http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=pIdjNUgiG2h8yxbhC54SSy4SEskAoEMs For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu
