> Tuesday, November 3, 2020 > How Could It Be Possible? Spending $25 Billion on Covid tests bought lots > of them, but are any accurate? Spending $Billions on drugs bought us > worthless remdesivir, suppressing cheap alternatives... and the article I > wished I could have written > <https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/11/how-could-it-be-possible-spending-25.html> > http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/11/how-could-it-be-possible-spending-25.html
> How could it be possible that so much of the Covid pandemic narrative: > its bat origin (untouched by any lab); the story that human incursions into > nature cause our pandemics and must be stopped; the saga in which effective > medications are suppressed and useless ones are promoted; the way that > cases are diagnosed; and the value of non-pharmaceutical interventions like > masks--might all be false, based on fake science, fake statistics, and > lying public health officials? > > How could it be possible? Chris Martenson wrote the article > <https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/martenson-we-are-pawns-bigger-game-we-realize> > I > wanted to write, and explains how he (and I) came to fall down the rabbit > hole, and gradually came to accept a totally different narrative than the > mainstream media and government officials have proclaimed. What happened > to us is simple: > > > <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-A1O5ea1zugc/X6IJARzJAmI/AAAAAAAACng/oDIzK0LA8NkxI5Myu5frbv3JbnlI-uSpACLcBGAsYHQ/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-11-03%2Bat%2B8.50.40%2BPM.png> > > He writes, > > <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-k40n0B2YA_c/X6ILrAYc9kI/AAAAAAAACn0/g_y-Wwmw60EfzQpqDe7nRpbsaXg8raq1ACLcBGAsYHQ/image.png> > > Please read Martenson's complete article. I understand that this is too > much of a leap for many people to make, but if you have read this far, keep > watching what is happening. > > Here is a lighter version of what Martenson is saying, in an opinion piece > in the Wall Street Journal written by Holman Jenkins, Jr., published > October 30. It is titled, "The Other Media Blackout: How can Americans > use good sense about an epidemic about which they are fed false > information?" > <https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-other-media-blackout-11604094677> His > final sentence is, *"We battle the virus, while being fed a colossally > distorted picture of the epidemic and its progress by an incompetent and > sociopathic press."* > > Gentle reader, see how so much of what is written about Covid does not > make any sense, and reassess what you hear, as often as you can. Try to > put the pieces together. > > Today I received three news items that were so jarring to the Covid story > we are meant to believe, so inconsistent with each other, that I had to > mention them. > > ----------------------------- > > First, we have been told that 25-50% of cases may be asymptomatic. Fauci > said this recently, and it has been a standard belief since the start of > the pandemic. (I happen to think it is way low. But anyway...) > > Second, we have been told there are 2 tests to use to diagnose a current > case: the PCR test and the rapid antigen test. Using these tests, massive > numbers of Americans have been diagnosed with Covid-19, up to 100,000 per > day. Cases have been rising rapidly, and as a result harsher lockdown > measures are being enforced in some states and some countries. > > Third, we assume that government officials want to reduce cases, that they > impose quarantines and restrictions to protect us, and that they respond > sensibly to the results of Covid tests. > Here are the news articles: > > 1. 75 prisoners at 2 Maine prisons, and 9 staff, have been diagnosed > with Covid using *rapid antigen tests* > <https://www.pressherald.com/2020/11/03/covid-19-outbreak-at-maine-correctional-center-grows-to-81-confirmed-cases/> > *.* The vast majority of prisoners were asymptomatic, and a few had mild > symptoms. > > 2. "FDA warns about *false positive* results from COVID-19 *(rapid) > antigen tests* > <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-fda-test/u-s-fda-warns-about-false-positive-results-from-covid-19-antigen-tests-idUSKBN27J2K6> > *.*" Reuters reported that after false positive tests in nursing homes, > FDA wanted to remind us that we can't trust these tests. > > 3. New Jersey state Senator Michael Testa released a leaked document > from the NJ Department of Corrections > <https://www.senatenj.com/index.php/testa/testa-murphy-administration-releasing-covid-positive-inmates-at-bus-train-stations-tomorrow/50751>, > which directs correctional staff to release and transport Covid positive > prisoners to train and bus stations on November 4. Staff are directed to > wear full PPE while transporting prisoners. > > ---------------------------- > So, are the prisoners positive or negative? If negative, or > noncontagious, why are staff donning PPE? If positive, why are officials > releasing them to public transportation? Is the goal to cause more cases? > > Are the tests false positives? Or are most "cases" asymptomatic? > > Why are we using tests that FDA warns us may be inaccurate? Does any of > this make sense? > > There are only 3 types of tests commercially available in the US: the > rapid antigen, the PCR (a.k.a. molecular test) and the antibody test. There > are dozens of different PCR and antibody tests. The antibody test is > intended to tell you if you have previously had Covid. None are very > accurate. FDA does not know how accurate they are, nor how they compare > with each other. See my previous posts on the huge problems with PCR > <https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/10/the-testing-mess-lack-of-reliable-data.html> > and antibody tests > <https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/10/useless-fda-and-cdc-admit-covid.html>. > All were approved by FDA under emergency use authorizations > <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383533/>, and have not > undergone full FDA screening and approval. > > Congress approved $25 BILLION DOLLARS for Covid testing > <https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2014836>, so we are doing > lots of tests. We have shortages of reagents, shortages of other test > materials, the tests are non-reproducible... but a lot of money was made > available for testing, so, we are testing. > > Has it helped reduce cases? Has it prevented spread? Who knows. There > is no way to tell. We cannot compare it to the past, because we were > testing very few people then. We can't compare regions, because so many > different companies' tests are being performed, even within one lab. Dr. > Fauci has now admitted that PCR tests may be using cycle thresholds (35 and > above) that are only testing for *"dead nucleotides"* > <https://alethonews.com/2020/11/03/dr-fauci-admits-the-pcr-test-for-coronavirus-is-all-but-useless-as-it-is-administered-in-the-us/>--his > words, not mine. > > You are being told to trust the science. And who am I to tell you, there > isn't any? > --- Support News from Underground: https://bit.ly/NFUSupport Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com You received this email because you are subscribed to News from Underground. To unsubscribe from this email list, please go to: http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=pIdjNUgiG2h8yxbhC54SSy4SEskAoEMs For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu
