Hello Mathew, > This is an interesting idea, while I don't see it being all that useful for > most applications there are some that could really benefit (large file > proxying first comes to mind). If it could be achieved without introducing > too much of a CPU overhead in keeping track of the requests & available > parts it would be quite interesting.
I think that this idea is valid only for large files. And about CPU overhead, I has this in my mind. I think that with hints of nginx-devel, I can address this. > I would like to see an option to supply a minimum size to restrict this > feature too (either by after x bytes are passed add to map/rbtree whatever > or based off content-length). I agree. But I have not tried to solve it yet. Regards. -- Alex Garzão Projetista de Software Azion Technologies alex.garzao (at) azion.com _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
