Hello! On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:16:48PM -0700, Piotr Sikora wrote:
> Hey Maxim, > > > Ok, fair enough. Wouldn't something like this be better then > > (untested)? > > It would, originally I had pretty much the same patch, but for some > reason I thought you'd like the one I send better. > > Tested and works fine. > > > --- a/src/os/unix/ngx_errno.h > > +++ b/src/os/unix/ngx_errno.h > > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ typedef int ngx_err_t; > > #define NGX_ENOMOREFILES 0 > > #define NGX_ELOOP ELOOP > > #define NGX_EBADF EBADF > > +#define NGX_EOPNOTSUPP EOPNOTSUPP > > Just a nitpick, but I believe that NGX_EOPNOTSUPP should be added > between NGX_EINPROGRESS & NGX_EADDRINUSE, to keep the order the same > as in system's errno.h. Sure, fixed (and added win32 define for completeness). Committed, thanks. -- Maxim Dounin http://nginx.org/en/donation.html _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
