Hey Maxim, > As previously suggested, this doesn't looks like a right way to > go. If LibreSSL folks continue to insist this is OpenSSL-2.0.0, > then we'll probably have redefine OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER > ourselves.
Unfortunately, it looks like they've made their mind :( The discussion on it stopped, they've made 4 releases with that version already and OpenBSD is in the release mode right now, so I don't expect that they're going to change it. Redefining OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER doesn't seem like the prettiest solution, though. > Same as for BoringSSL patch - I don't think we should add #if's > here. See my reply in the BoringSSL thread... I don't think that it makes sense to keep setting the callback if we know that it doesn't do anything. Effectively, we're masking the issue and pretending that the feature works with BoringSSL and LibreSSL, simply because it compiles (i.e. the thing you were worried about). Best regards, Piotr Sikora _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
