On 16/10/2015 13:20, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:36:13AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:

I'm making changes to a filter module and when it detected an error it
returned NGX_ERROR however the response generated to the client isn't
the expected 500 internal server error I would have expected given said
return.

So the question is do filters have to manually call
ngx_http_finalize_request(r, NGX_HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR); or is it
expected that the upper layers should actually do the right thing and
ensure the client doesn't get a bad response generated from the current
state of r with no indication an error occurred?
In filters, it's already to late to return anything in case of
errors.  In body filters, it's way too late - the response was
already partially sent.  And in header filters there is a chance that
other filters allocated something response-specific, and an
attempt to return a different response will break things.  So,
when you return NGX_ERROR from a filter, the connection is just
closed.
There are a few core filters which seem to contradict this;

range does:
return ngx_http_range_not_satisfiable(r, ctx);

while image does:
return ngx_http_filter_finalize_request(r,
&ngx_http_image_filter_module,
NGX_HTTP_UNSUPPORTED_MEDIA_TYPE);

The range filter is the one I was looking at, picking back up the work you gave feedback on a while back with regards allow partial content responses to be used to satisfy range requests.

During testing for failures I triggered the NGX_ERROR case here:
https://github.com/nginx/nginx/blob/master/src/http/modules/ngx_http_range_filter_module.c#L233

When I triggered this case client recieved an broken 200 response, where as if I did finalise the request I could deliver a 500 response, so was wondering if this would be correct in this situation?
If you absolutely must return an error from a filter - like, e.g.,
not modified filter do for 416 responses - there is a special
function to do this, ngx_http_filter_finalize_request().  It's
very fragile though, and I wouldn't recommend using it unless you
are sure you must do it.
Yer I found that later but seems my mail's been playing up today, so sorry for the crossed replies.

Thanks for the feedback :)

    Regards
    Steve

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel

Reply via email to