Hi Zhao Ping,

My test is much simpler than yours. I created /usr/local/html/(11111...99999) files on SSD (100 kb size) and wrote small lua script for wrk that adds 5 random digits to request. There are no such errors without patch with aio enabled.
These files does not change during test.

I'll try to reproduce this on CentOS 8 -- which repository do you use to install 5.x kernel?

Also, could you please run the test with 'sendfile on' and 'aio off' to get reference numbers for sendfile too?

Thanks in advance!

04.02.2021 10:08, Zhao, Ping пишет:
Another possible cause is that "/usr/local/html/64746" was changed/removed when 
other user tried to read it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhao, Ping
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:33 AM
To: nginx-devel@nginx.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add io_uring support in AIO(async io) module

Hi Mikhail,

I didn't see this error in my log. Following is my OS/Kernel:
CentOS:  8.1.1911
Kernel:    5.7.19
Liburing: liburing-1.0.7-3.el8.x86_64, liburing-devel-1.0.7-3.el8.x86_64 (from 
yum repo)

Regarding the error: 11: Resource temporarily unavailable. It's probably that too many 
read "/usr/local/html/64746" at one time which is still locked by previous 
read. I tried to repro this error with single file but it seems nginx auto store the 
signal file in memory and I don't see error. How do you perform the test? I want to repro 
this if possible.

My nginx reported this error before:
2021/01/04 05:04:29 [alert] 50769#50769: *11498 pread() read only 7101 of 15530 from 
"/mnt/cache1/17/68aae9d816ec02340ee617b7ee52a117", client: 11.11.11.3, server: _, request: "GET 
/_100kobject?version=cdn003191&thread=64 HTTP/1.1", host: "11.11.11.1:8080"
Which is fixed by my 2nd patch(Jan 25) already.

BR,
Ping

-----Original Message-----
From: nginx-devel <nginx-devel-boun...@nginx.org> On Behalf Of Mikhail 
Isachenkov
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 10:11 PM
To: nginx-devel@nginx.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add io_uring support in AIO(async io) module

Hi Ping Zhao,

When I try to repeat this test, I've got a huge number of these errors:

2021/02/03 10:22:48 [crit] 30018#30018: *2 aio read "/usr/local/html/64746" 
failed (11: Resource temporarily unavailable) while sending response to client, client: 
127.0.0.1, server: localhost,
request: "GET /64746 HTTP/1.1", host: "localhost"

I tested this patch on Ubuntu 20.10 (5.8.0-1010-aws kernel version) and Fedora 
33 (5.10.11-200.fc33.x86_64) with the same result.

Did you get any errors in error log with patch applied? Which OS/kernel did you 
use for testing? Did you perform any specific tuning before running?

25.01.2021 11:24, Zhao, Ping пишет:
Hello, add a small update to correct the length when part of request already 
received in previous.
This case may happen when using io_uring and throughput increased.

# HG changeset patch
# User Ping Zhao <ping.z...@intel.com> # Date 1611566408 18000
#      Mon Jan 25 04:20:08 2021 -0500
# Node ID f2c91860b7ac4b374fff4353a830cd9427e1d027
# Parent  1372f9ee2e829b5de5d12c05713c307e325e0369
Correct length calculation when part of request received.

diff -r 1372f9ee2e82 -r f2c91860b7ac src/core/ngx_output_chain.c
--- a/src/core/ngx_output_chain.c       Wed Jan 13 11:10:05 2021 -0500
+++ b/src/core/ngx_output_chain.c       Mon Jan 25 04:20:08 2021 -0500
@@ -531,6 +531,14 @@
size = ngx_buf_size(src);
       size = ngx_min(size, dst->end - dst->pos);
+#if (NGX_HAVE_FILE_IOURING)
+    /*
+     * check if already received part of the request in previous,
+     * calculate the remain length
+     */
+    if(dst->last > dst->pos && size > (dst->last - dst->pos))
+        size = size - (dst->last - dst->pos); #endif
sendfile = ctx->sendfile && !ctx->directio;

-----Original Message-----
From: nginx-devel <nginx-devel-boun...@nginx.org> On Behalf Of Zhao,
Ping
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 9:44 AM
To: nginx-devel@nginx.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add io_uring support in AIO(async io) module

Hi Vladimir,

No special/extra configuration needed, but need check if 'aio on' and 'sendfile 
off' is correctly set. This is my Nginx config for reference:

user nobody;
daemon off;
worker_processes 1;
error_log error.log ;
events {
      worker_connections 65535;
      use epoll;
}

http {
      include mime.types;
      default_type application/octet-stream;
      access_log on;
      aio on;
      sendfile off;
      directio 2k;

      # Cache Configurations
      proxy_cache_path /mnt/cache0 levels=2 keys_zone=nginx-cache0:400m 
max_size=1400g inactive=4d use_temp_path=off; ......


To better measure the disk io performance data, I do the following steps:
1. To exclude other impact, and focus on disk io part.(This patch only impact 
disk aio read process) Use cgroup to limit Nginx memory usage. Otherwise Nginx 
may also use memory as cache storage and this may cause test result not so 
straight.(since most cache hit in memory, disk io bw is low, like my previous 
mail found which didn't exclude the memory cache impact)
       echo 2G > memory.limit_in_bytes
       use ' cgexec -g memory:nginx' to start Nginx.

2. use wrk -t 100 -c 1000, with random 25000 http requests.
       My previous test used -t 200 connections, comparing with -t 1000, libaio 
performance drop more when connections numbers increased from 200 to 1000, but 
io_uring doesn't. It's another advantage of io_uring.

3. First clean the cache disk and run the test for 30 minutes to let Nginx 
store the cache files to nvme disk as much as possible.

4. Rerun the test, this time Nginx will use ngx_file_aio_read to
extract the cache files in nvme cache disk. Use iostat to track the io
data. The data should be align with NIC bw since all data should be
from cache disk.(need exclude memory as cache storage impact)

Following is the test result:

Nginx worker_processes 1:
                4k              100k            1M
Io_uring        220MB/s 1GB/s           1.3GB/s
Libaio          70MB/s          250MB/s 600MB/s(with -c 200, 1.0GB/s)


Nginx worker_processes 4:
                4k              100k            1M
Io_uring        800MB/s 2.5GB/s         2.6GB/s(my nvme disk io maximum bw)
libaio          250MB/s 900MB/s 2.0GB/s

So for small request, io_uring has huge improvement than libaio. In previous mail, 
because I didn't exclude the memory cache storage impact, most cache file is stored in 
memory, very few are from disk in case of 4k/100k. The data is not correct.(for 1M, 
because the cache is too big to store in memory, it wat in disk)  Also I enabled directio 
option "directio 2k" this time to avoid this.

Regards,
Ping

-----Original Message-----
From: nginx-devel <nginx-devel-boun...@nginx.org> On Behalf Of
Vladimir Homutov
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 12:43 AM
To: nginx-devel@nginx.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add io_uring support in AIO(async io) module

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:32:30AM +0000, Zhao, Ping wrote:
It depends on if disk io is the performance hot spot or not. If yes,
io_uring shows improvement than libaio. With 4KB/100KB length 1 Nginx
thread it's hard to see performance difference because iostat is only
around ~10MB/100MB per second. Disk io is not the performance bottle
neck, both libaio and io_uring have the same performance. If you
increase request size or Nginx threads number, for example 1MB length
or Nginx thread number 4. In this case, disk io became the
performance bottle neck, you will see io_uring performance improvement.

Can you please provide full test results with specific nginx configuration?

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel


--
Best regards,
Mikhail Isachenkov
NGINX Professional Services
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel


--
Best regards,
Mikhail Isachenkov
NGINX Professional Services
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel

Reply via email to