> On 17 Sep 2022, at 00:58, Maxim Dounin <mdou...@mdounin.ru> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:36:31AM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>
>>> On 26 Aug 2022, at 07:01, Maxim Dounin <mdou...@mdounin.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Maxim Dounin <mdou...@mdounin.ru>
>>> # Date 1661481945 -10800
>>> # Fri Aug 26 05:45:45 2022 +0300
>>> # Node ID 2cd8fbeb4edc5a99b725585edc02a16a8a0c503e
>>> # Parent 069a4813e8d6d7ec662d282a10f5f7062ebd817f
>>> SSL: disabled saving tickets to session cache.
>>>
>>> OpenSSL for TLSv1.3 tries to save tickets into session cache "because some
>>> applications just want to know about the creation of a session". To avoid
>>> trashing session cache with useless data, we do not save such sessions now.
>>>
>>
>> For the record, BoringSSL doesn't seem to call new_session_cb for TLSv1.3
>> at all, so there is no way to resume sessions with SSL_OP_NO_TICKET set.
>> In contrary, OpenSSL emits stateful tickets in this case, which contain
>> dummy session id used then as a session cache lookup key on server
>> (much like session ids in TLSv1.2)
>>
>> OTOH, without SSL_OP_NO_TICKET set, OpenSSL emits self-containing tickets
>> with enough info to resume session, so nothing to lookup in session cache.
>> The latter makes impractical storing something in session cache, except
>> to use the callback for things like tracking "the creation of a session".
>> Namely, OpenSSL puts session (i.e. something that SSL_get_session returns)
>> and supplementary info to session ticket message as the ticket value.
>
> It looks like you are trying to introduce "stateful tickets" and
> "self-containing tickets" terms, which is somewhat confusing
> unless carefully explained. OpenSSL itself tries to use terms
> "stateful tickets" and "stateless tickets", with the similar
> drawbacks.
Indeed, OpenSSL SSL_OP_NO_TICKET documentation is what I refer to.
While OpenSSL terms may look odd, they are useful to describe the
difference (and tricks) in TLSv1.3 session resumption with and
without SSL_OP_NO_TICKET, as implemented to OpenSSL specifically.
>
> A better explanation would be to follow generic term "session
> ticket", as originally introduced in RFC 4507 for TLS session
> resumption without server-side state.
>
> In these terms (as always used before introduction of TLSv1.3 and
> currently used in many places, including nginx own documentation
> and the source code) there are two basic mechanisms to resume
> sessions: server-side session cache and session tickets (used to
> resume sessions without server-side state).
>
> Without SSL_OP_NO_TICKET set, OpenSSL uses tickets as long as
> supported by the client.
>
> With SSL_OP_NO_TICKET set, OpenSSL does not use tickets, and uses
> server-side session cache instead (if configured).
>
> The only difference between TLSv1.3 and previous protocols is how
> session ids are sent to the client if server-side session cache is
> used. In case of SSL and TLS up to and including TLSv1.2, session
> ids are sent in the dedicated fields of the ServerHello and
> ClientHello handshake messages. In case of TLSv1.3, dedicated
> fields were removed, so session ids are sent in the
> NewSessionTicket messages ("a database lookup key" in terms of RFC
> 8446).
>
>> With these thoughts in mind, I think log could be clarified to emphasize:
>> - it's not tickets that are stored in cache
>> - with SSL_OP_NO_TICKET set TLSv1.3 session are still saved to lookup by id.
>
> Hope it is clear enough now.
What I'd like to clarify is the difference between session and (session)
ticket applied to session cache. Ticket is a container used to envelope
session state (essentially, a session) and send in the NewSessionTicket
message "to resume sessions and avoid keeping per-client session state",
as seen in RFC 8446, 4.6.1 (and somewhat similar in 4507/5077).
struct {
uint32 ticket_lifetime;
uint32 ticket_age_add;
opaque ticket_nonce<0..255>;
opaque ticket<1..2^16-1>;
Extension extensions<0..2^16-2>;
} NewSessionTicket;
So it looks inappropriate to say that tickets are saved in cache.
OTOH, "ticket" can be seen a correct wording if speaking in terms
of NewSessionTicket ticket field, or in contrast to "session id"
synthesized by OpenSSL for the SSL_OP_NO_TICKET case in TLSv1.3.
In that sense, I'm fine with using "ticket" (not to say changing
"ticket" to "session" or "session state" brings a tautology).
However this looks not so important to spend more time on this,
I'm fine with either case.
>
>>
>>> diff --git a/src/event/ngx_event_openssl.c b/src/event/ngx_event_openssl.c
>>> --- a/src/event/ngx_event_openssl.c
>>> +++ b/src/event/ngx_event_openssl.c
>>> @@ -3815,6 +3815,22 @@ ngx_ssl_new_session(ngx_ssl_conn_t *ssl_
>>> ngx_ssl_session_cache_t *cache;
>>> u_char buf[NGX_SSL_MAX_SESSION_SIZE];
>>>
>>> +#ifdef TLS1_3_VERSION
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * OpenSSL for TLSv1.3 tries to save tickets into session cache
>>> + * "because some applications just want to know about the creation
>>> + * of a session"; do not cache such sessions
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + if (SSL_version(ssl_conn) == TLS1_3_VERSION
>>> + && (SSL_get_options(ssl_conn) & SSL_OP_NO_TICKET) == 0)
>>> + {
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> len = i2d_SSL_SESSION(sess, NULL);
>>>
>>> /* do not cache too big session */
>>>
>>
>> Looks good.
>> [..]
--
Sergey Kandaurov
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list -- nginx-devel@nginx.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-devel-le...@nginx.org
