Going to pushing out the change to 1 worker later today.
It's just become more of an exercise in understanding why it was behaving
that way.
Even under "high" load (in this case ~50 active_connections), the 3 socks
don't seem to be getting equal number of requests.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Ruslan Ermilov <r...@nginx.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:03:59PM -0700, John Watson wrote:
> > Well doesn't make sense when theres >4 concurrent requests
> > At any given time there's around 12 active_connections, but sock-3 is
> > still never being used
>
> Can you see a difference with only one worker process?
>
> Currently, different workers have distinct counters of active connections.
> It should be unnoticed under a high load.
>
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM, John Watson <[1]j...@disqus.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ohhhh... that makes complete sense now.
> > Had 4 workers.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Ruslan Ermilov <[2]r...@nginx.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:45:14AM -0700, John Watson wrote:
> > > Was investigating some issues today when we noticed that
> > least_conn wasn't
> > > behaving as expected.
> > > upstream backend {
> > > least_conn;
> > > server unix:/tmp/sock-1.sock;
> > > server unix:/tmp/sock-2.sock;
> > > server unix:/tmp/sock-3.sock;
> > > }
> > > The expected behavior for 4 simultaneous requests it should
> > distribute
> > > them:
> > > sock-1: 2
> > > sock-2: 1
> > > sock-3: 1
> > > However, what we're seeing is:
> > > sock-1: 3
> > > sock-2: 1
> > > sock-3: 0
> > > Which coincidentally lines up with the number of requests a
> > socket can
> > > service simultaneously.
> > > This is using 1.2.7
> >
> > And the number of configured worker processes is?
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
