Hello,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:35 PM, cachito <[email protected]> wrote: > B.R. Wrote: > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Hello, > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, cachito <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > if ($http_cookie ~* > > > > > "comment_author|wordpress_[a-f0-9]+|wp-postpass|wordpress_logged_in") > > { > > > set $no_cache 1; > > > } > > > > > > > If the user sends requests using cookies from Wordpress, the cache > > won't > > be used... > > Thus, you seem not to cache requests from Wordpress at all. That CMS > > need > > resources such as power and generates huge traffic (that needs to be > > processed aswell). > > Are you sure not all the Wordpress requests contain cookie(s)? > > > > I'm manually deleting cookies to force caching and it isn't happening. Even > if I set $no_cache to 0 in this particular section (or at the end of the if > list) nothing happens. > Is your conf really applied? Check logs on reload to be sure. > > > > > > > > #The different cache zones reside in different filesystems. the > > "pages" > > > zone > > > is saved in RAM for fast delivery. > > > location / { > > > proxy_pass http://upstream; > > > proxy_cache pages; > > > proxy_cache_key $cache_key; > > > proxy_cache_valid 60m; # I was hoping to have the proxy query > > the > > > upstream once every hour for updated content. > > > > > > > Read the correct syntax and use of proxy_cache_valid. > > If no HTTP code is specified as optional parameter, it says 'then only > > 200, > > 301 and 302 responses are cached'. > > This is the intended behavior. If the upstream responds something useful, > cache it and serve it. Errors shouldn't be cached, and the stale cache > should be served for that URL. > Ok > > > > > > > > > # 2 rules to dedicate the no caching rule for logged in users. > > > proxy_cache_bypass $no_cache; # Do not cache the response. > > > proxy_no_cache $no_cache; # Do not serve response from cache. > > > > > > > Actually, those 2 comments are inverted: proxy_no_cache controls > > whether > > or not items should be written in cache and proxy_cache_bypass > > controls > > whether or not content should be read from it. > > Comments aside, when $no_cache is set to 0 it mandates that the upstream > response should be cached and the client should be served content from > cache, right? > I unnderstood the double negation the same way as yours. --- *B. R.*
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
