On 9 January 2014 12:24, nano <[email protected]> wrote: > I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Sorry chap - I didn't say that and I don't think that. There may well be some specific target audiences not well served by the aggregate of the current (psuedo-)documentation sources, but that doesn't mean they themselves are /that/ bad. My problems with them are specific and fixable, and not just "make it better!" J _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
