Hi! On 2014-03-03 18:45, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Note well that configuring ssl_buffer_size to 1400 isn't a good > idea unless you are doing so for your own performance testing. > See previous discussions for details.
Maxim, I remember the discussion that was started by Ilya. From what I understood is that it depends on your specific needs. If you have a website with standard markup and without serving large files, it seems reasonable to choose a smaller ssl buffer size to avoid TLS record fragmentation (and thus optimize time to first byte). On the other hand, if you deliver large streams, it would seem be counter-productive to limit the buffer size since you'd occur more bandwidth and processing overhead. Or did I misunderstand and you'd still say that a ssl_buffer_size of 1400 is generally a bad idea? Best Alex _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
