Many thanks Maxim. Have a nice week-end..
Nicolas FLINOIS ALTEN Contracting Company Amadeus, Sales & e-Commerce Platform T: + 33 (0) 4 92 94 63 50 (Ext:6350) [email protected] www.amadeus.com/ From: Maxim Dounin <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Date: 27/06/2014 18:35 Subject: Re: Upstream performances: what if one node only ? Sent by: [email protected] Hello! On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:53:24PM +0200, Nicolas Flinois wrote: > Hi all, > > I am wondering about the possible extra-cost of using a single-node > upstream into proxy_pass compared with 'proxy_pass host' directly. > I need to automate application servers move, and find convenient to update > upstream definitions only (defined into dedicated files). > > Solution1: > > upstream upOne { > server somehost; > } > [..] > proxy_pass upOne; > > > Solution2: > > proxy_pass somehost; > > Is solution1 more time-consuming than solution2 at run-time ? There is no difference. Internally, proxy_pass with a hostname creates an implicit upstream{} with a single server, and uses it. -- Maxim Dounin http://nginx.org/ _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
